Old Judge is Mad. Says No One Should Own a Firearm
Gregory Kielma • November 23, 2023
Boy This is One Mad Judge
Federal Judge: There’s No Constitutional Right to Buy a Gun
By TTAG Contributor -November 22, 202387
From the NRA-ILA
Honest people can disagree with the Founders’ decision to enshrine the Second Amendment within the Bill of Rights. They cannot, however, pretend that decision never happened. For much of the 20th Century, however, gun control activists tried to convince the public that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” had nothing to do with the right of individuals to keep and carry guns for their own self-protection.
That charade – never convincing to anyone who could read – has been debunked by the U.S. Supreme Court no less than four times in the last 15 years. But Second Amendment denialism remains an active strain of the firearm prohibition effort, as demonstrated by a federal judge in Colorado who ruled last week that whatever the provision means, it does not include the right to buy a gun
That decision came in the case of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners v. Polis, which challenged Colorado’s three day waiting period for firearm purchases. Proponents of the law undoubtedly knew it was in trouble after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which clarified how lower courts are to analyze challenges to gun control laws under the Second Amendment.
Bruen stated: “When the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. The government must then justify its regulation by demonstrating that it is consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.” This test likely spells doom for Colorado’s waiting period, as laws of that type were completely unknown to the generation that adopted the Second Amendment.
Faced with this reality, Judge John L. Kane – appointed to the federal bench by Jimmy Carter in 1977 – decided to stretch reason to the breaking point by deciding the right to possess a firearm doesn’t include the right to acquire one.
The court began its analysis by acknowledging that the Second Amendment right articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 2008 case of District of Columbia v. Heller meant “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation.” But then Judge Kane went on to insist: “purchase and delivery are one means of creating the opportunity to ‘have weapons.’ The relevant question is whether the plain text covers that specific means. It does not.”
Oregon gun store counter assault rifle AR-15
According to this “reasoning,” a state could completely ban the sale and delivery of firearms without implicating the Second Amendment. This would imply a right to have something, but not to obtain it through the most obvious and ordinary means.
Of course, it’s true that the Second Amendment says nothing explicitly about buying and receiving guns. But it’s also true the First Amendment says nothing explicitly about buying and receiving newspapers. Nevertheless, any judge insisting a ban on newspaper sales would not implicate the First Amendment prohibition on “abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press” would in doing so disgrace himself and ruin his professional and intellectual credibility.
Perhaps recognizing this, Judge Kane hedged his bets by offering a number of alternative theories about why Colorado’s waiting period did not infringe the Second Amendment.
First, he theorized, “Even if purchasing a firearm could be read into the terms ‘keep’ or ‘bear,’ receipt of a firearm without any delay could not be, as the Founders would not have expected instant, widespread availability of the firearm of their choice.” Judge Kane attempted to bolster this argument by pointing to “expert” testimony that indicated firearm purchases at the time of the founding were not as convenient, prompt, or accessible as they are today.
But even these “experts” acknowledged this was because technology, production, and marketing were circumstantially more primitive in those days, not because legislators made a deliberate choice to delay firearm purchases. Of course, virtually nothing that involved the delivery of a good was as efficient and accessible to the founding generation as it is in modern times. But the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly made clear that it will not tolerate “frivolous” arguments that 18th Century technological limitations delineate the scope of constitutional rights in the present day, including in a Second Amendment case that dealt with stun guns.
Next, Judge Kane pointed to language in Heller that he claimed rendered “presumptively lawful” any regulation on “the conditions or qualifications” of the “commercial sale of firearms.” He then argued: “Colorado’s Waiting-Period Act regulates only the sale, and specifically sellers, of firearms. … The Act does not apply to anyone who does not ‘sell a firearm.’”
Putting aside the fact that the disputed issues in Heller had nothing to do with firearm sales, much less mandatory waiting periods, Judge Kane was again resorting to frivolous formalism in attempting to stake his reasoning on the distinction between sellers and purchasers. Colorado’s waiting period imposes an arbitrary and de facto impediment on the purchase of guns, thereby implicating the rights of buyers at least as much as sellers.
Dragonmans gun store range
Returning to the First Amendment, no one would take seriously an argument that a person’s First Amendment right to access information was not implicated just because a particular restraint applied to a publisher or bookseller and not the reader himself.
Meanwhile, the language Judge Kane invoked to argue the Supreme Court allows firearm sales to be regulated cuts against his primary ruling by suggesting the Supreme Court considers such sales as the default starting point under the Second Amendment.
But Judge Kane wasn’t finished, and proposed yet another reason why Colorado’s waiting period is consistent with the Second Amendment, even if he were wrong about everything else.
Again, while acknowledging – as the parties themselves agreed – that waiting periods for firearm purchases were unknown in American law until well into the 20th Century, he still found them consistent with America’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. This was because, he said, “our Nation had a historical tradition of regulating the carrying and use of firearms by intoxicated individuals,” and “the Waiting-Period Act and the intoxication laws both work to prevent individuals in a temporary impulsive state from irresponsibly using a firearm.”
Judge Kane was dismissive of plaintiffs’ attempts to point out the obvious distinction that intoxication speaks to the condition of a particular individual in a particular moment, while the waiting period broadly applies to firearm sales generally, regardless of the buyer’s condition or state of mind. His response to this fundamental difference was that the intoxication laws affected all intoxicated persons, some of whom also might not have behaved irresponsibly with a firearm.
Judge Kane’s final gambit was to suggest that the Supreme Court had indicated a general openness to shall-issue licensing schemes for carrying firearms, so long as they were not directed to “abusive ends.” This, he said, was analogous to the waiting period, because both require a “defined requirement” to be met before exercise of the right, and plaintiffs had not proven the waiting period was abusive.
Judge Kane offered no limiting principles for what sorts of laws purportedly aimed at impulsive or irresponsible behavior or that imposed “defined requirements” prior to the exercise of the right to keep and bear arms might be permissible under the Second Amendment. But it’s difficult to understand how his reasoning would be distinguishable from the “interest-balancing” the Supreme Court specifically rejected in Bruen, which likewise focused on why the government purported to be acting, not on whether such actions were well-established in American history.
There is perhaps no legal rule so clear and unequivocal that it cannot be purposely misconstrued by a judge who is more interested in his preferred outcome than in actually following the law. But if the Polis case shows anything about Bruen’s historical test, it’s that it makes spotting such judges easier than ever.
This article originally appeared at nraila.org and is reprinted here with permission.
I Love to Cook Here Are The Necessary Steps To Properly Clean Your Shellfish All my friends know I love to cook says Gregg Kielma; FFL, Firearms Instructor, First Aid Fundamentals Instructor, ERT Captain and Gunsmith. From award winning barbeque to my fresh seafood, my passion is cooking. I'm no means a chef. But I'd like to think I could give them a good run for their money. Take a look below at some of the ways to stay safe while making your favorite seafood dishes. Remember safety first! For some of my best seafood recipes please drop me an email and I'll send a few to you! kielmagregory@gmail.com Discover how to clean clams, mussels, and shrimp at home with simple tips for maintaining freshness, proper storage, and optimal flavor.© Catherine Sillars • Preparing seafood at home can save money and deliver restaurant-level results. • Knowing how to check freshness is key to cooking great clams, mussels, and shrimp. • Proper storage is crucial to preserving the flavor and freshness of shellfish. It might seem impossible to enjoy a fancy seafood dinner while on a penny-pinching budget, but that’s only because you’re not prepping it yourself at home. Cooking your own shellfish is far cheaper than ordering it out, and not nearly as intimidating as it sounds. And you don't need to work at a seafood counter to do it right. Cleaning your own shellfish doesn’t have to be a scary or complicated undertaking. Consider this your 101 guide to cleaning three popular kinds of shellfish at home, plus a few recipe recommendations to put your new skills to delicious use. Clams Fresh clams should be alive when you buy them, so treat them like the delicate little divas they are. If their shells are open, give them a tap—if they snap shut, they’re good to go. If they stay open or look cracked, throw them out. If you can’t quite tell or there's a questionable smell, toss 'em straight into the trash. Before cooking, they need to be cleaned inside and out. Rinse the clams under cold running water while scrubbing off any grit with a clean sponge or dish towel. Next, soak them in a big bowl of ice water with a handful of kosher salt for about 20 minutes. This “purging” step helps them release any hidden sand—because no one wants crunchy clams casino. Store the clams on a wire rack inside a deep baking dish or broiler pan. Top with ice and cover with a clean kitchen towel. Keep them cold (but not submerged) so they can breathe. Once you’re ready to cook the clams, get a little inspiration from our recipes for clam chowder or linguine with clams. Mussels Mussels get the same shell-tap test as clams. If they have cracked shells or don’t close when tapped or rinsed under cold water, to the trash they go. Rinse the remaining mussels under cold running water and scrub away any grit. The key here is removing the “beard”—those stringy fibers poking from the shell seam on the thicker end of the mussel. Grip it with your fingers or a clean towel and tug firmly toward the hinge until it releases. Once they’re clean on the outside, submerge the mussels in a salty ice water bath for 20 minutes to purge sand and grit, then drain and rinse again. Store them just like you would clams—wire rack over ice, covered with a damp cloth. For dinner, try out our recipes for the classic moules frites or steamed mussels with tomatoes and garlic. Shrimp Shrimp are the easiest of the bunch—no temperature-sensitive shells or purging required— but they still need to be fresh. They should smell like the ocean and feel plump and firm to the touch. If your shrimp still have heads, twist and remove them. Remove the legs, then peel the shrimp from the curved side. Leave the tails on if you're making shrimp cocktail or anything dippable, so you have a built-in handle. Then, use a paring knife to make a shallow slit down the back and remove the dark vein (aka digestive tract). Finally, rinse the shrimp under cold water, and then get to cooking dishes like shrimp street corn skillet, shrimp and tomato succotash, or creamy lemon garlic shrimp.
The United States is Invaded: What Would You Do? In case of a US invasion by another country, would US citizens truly fight back with their guns as allowed by the 2nd amendment? Never in the history of warfare has there a worse nightmare. We follow a Prussian model; many of our private citizens have good military training and access to arms. Opposition Officers would need to fill out their next of kin while getting off the boat. Most would live less than 48 hours. People would shoot infantry forces to pieces and disappear into home terrain at night. Communications lines cut, fuel blown up, anyone moving after dark might as well shoot themselves and get it over with. A simple troop movement through Appalachia would make them all wish they’d never been born. I couldn’t imagine fighting in mountains against an enemy where everyone has a gun and 10 percent of them have military training. And I mean everyone would have a gun. Even if a small percentage of well-trained citizens reacted the effects would be devastating. To quote a WWII Japanese leader “there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass. Then the scary stuff would start. Fuel air bombing their hospitals and command centers, homemade mines everywhere, kids hanging from trees. We are the big scary country… but no one should forget we invented the ambush, sneaking up in the woods, sniping from behind rocks shooting conventional forces to pieces and really making them wish they could go home. We trained the Viet Cong during WWII to fight the Japanese. We are so good at it that the forces we train can rise up and terrorize our own conventional forces.
What Are The Fundamental Rule of Concealed Carry? Gregg Kielma Tactical K Training and Firearms Instructor My Thoughts The first rule in my opinion is having a CCW permit split into distinct three rules. 1. Concealed means concealed. What you can conceal depends on your body type. Finding the right gun to conceal, in a holster that’s most comfortable, using a carry method (strong-side, appendix, belly band, ankle, etc) that works best for you requires some experimentation. Most people probably won’t notice, sure, but criminals can spot bad concealment with ease. a. Concealed doesn’t just mean in a visual sense. Don’t advertise to the whole world that you are conceal carrying. Keep it on a need-to-know basis (spouse, best friend, informing a police officer when required by law, etc). Removing bumper stickers from your car and clothing from your wardrobe that scream “I have a gun” is a big plus. 2. Carry means carry. Don’t leave it at home. Don’t leave it in the car when your grocery shopping. Concealed carry is pointless if your gun is not immediately available to you when you need it. Make it a point to carry every single day, always, wherever lawful to do so. 3. Weapon should mean your wits. Understand that use of lethal force is ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS a last resort. Your wits should be your greatest weapon; Just because you carry doesn’t mean you’re invincible. Avoiding confrontation is always the best outcome, no matter how damaged your ego becomes. Pay attention to your surroundings and get out of dodge when your gut feeling says something isn’t right. However, if you’re in a dangerous situation, and you feel like you’re in fear of your life… draw swift, aim true, and when in doubt shot accurately until the threat is stopped. Gregg Kielma Tactical K Training and Firearms Instructor 941 737-6956
Real Life Training: You Asked For It, Here It Is! Gregg Kielma Most of us these days are not getting enough training. Especially if you have your concealed carry license. If we are lucky, we get to the indoor range once a week, but a lot of you out there probably train a lot less than that. Shooting at a static range at paper targets is good, but to really get your skills to the next level, we need to be doing much more because we all know that is NOT how real gun fights work. There will be a lot of movement from both you and the bad guy. There will most likely be other people around that you must MAKE SURE to protect and not accidentally shoot them instead of the bad guy. We’ll give you a little taste of shooting around civilians and taking control of your family, friends or dinner date and guiding them out of harm’s way. Yes, we understand that the targets are not moving, and the cardboard civilians are just standing in one place and not running around screaming their heads off, but this is how we start you off getting used to shooting from awkward positions. We are also teaching how to get up and move to make sure you have a good shot at the bad guy and there is no chance you are going to hit an innocent bystander. Once we are happy with the students’ performance here, we switch over to UTM rounds (paintball bullets) and see how you do when the rubber dummies are real people shooting back and the civilians are running around in front of you. If you’re interested in being a part of this training, you can sign up as soon as it is offered or call for dates and times. It’s 3 days broken down this way: 1 day 8 hours classroom and 2 days at the range. You must supply your handgun with 200 rounds of ammo safety glasses, holster or holsters, long pants, and hat. Tactical K provides paintball guns, goggles and vest. Due to class conducted outside the classes are offered here in Florida from November1st through May15th. Class size is limited to 6 students. Classroom training is on Saturday morning and range time is the following Saturday (8 hours) and Sunday (6hours). Lunch and drinks provided at the range. (1 hour lunch break) Prerequisite: All training is certified with certificates provided through “The USCCA “and “Tactical K Training and Firearms” Certificates provided at graduation or course completion. • CCW Certified and Current (100.00) • Holster Certified Training (4 hours 60.00) • Home Defense Certified Training (4 hours $75.00) • Emergency First Aid Fundamentals (8 hours 150.00) • Safety Training (2 hours 50.00) • These must be taken before the 3-day outdoor class. Plan accordingly with the instructors. Cost: $435.00 Three-day outdoor class: $800.00 Total cost: $1235.00 Limited to 6 students: This is up close and very personalized intense training. Must be paid in full before the class. Payments accepted upon approval from Tactical K Training and Firearms. Liability waver must be sign. Please call for the next training days offered through Tactical K Training and Firearms. Gregg Kielma 941 737-6956
Florida Woman Arrested For Attempted Murder After Shooting At Neighbors Over Dog Dispute In an escalation of a neighborhood dispute, Sherry Lynn Garrison, a 54-year-old Florida woman, was arrested Friday in Middleburg after allegedly firing multiple shots at her neighbors and their home in the 5600 Block of Bee Hive Road. Says Gregg Kielma a Florida Firearms Instructor, was it really worth it Sherry? Shooting at your neighbors and neighbors' home with children inside. Shame on you and your neighbor for initiating a conflict by having his own firearm and shooting into the ground to scare you. And then you go inside, retrieve a firearm and start shooting at them, Wow! Then you fight with the police. What's wrong with you? Definite jail time coming if all these allegations are true. Poor choices Sherry. All of this because of a dog? See the article below. The incident, sparked by an argument over dogs, turned violent when Garrison, after pushing a neighbor, retrieved a handgun and shot at two adults in their yard and into their residence, where six children and another adult were present. At approximately 7:00 A.M., deputies from the Clay County Sheriff’s Office responded to a disturbance in the 5600 Block of Beehive Road following a report of gunfire. The suspect, Sherry Lynn Garrison, 54, was arrested after allegedly firing multiple shots at her neighbors during a heated dispute over dogs. According to the investigation, the conflict began when Garrison engaged in a physical altercation, pushing one of her neighbors. After returning to her own yard, the victim fired warning shots into the ground on his property to deter Garrison from coming back. In response, Garrison retrieved a handgun from her home, returned outside, and fired several shots at the victim and another adult in the yard. She also shot into the victims’ residence, where another adult and six children were present. Fortunately, no injuries were reported. Deputies took Garrison into custody at the scene, though she resisted arrest and fought with officers. Following an interview, Garrison was charged with two counts of attempted murder, one count of shooting into an occupied dwelling, one count of resisting law enforcement with violence, and one count of simple battery. Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Homeowner charged with assault after fighting alleged intruder — and furious observers are blasting Canadian cops Dave Urbanski August 23, 2025 Even Ontario Premier Doug Ford got into the act, declaring that 'something is broken' in the system when one is punished for self-defense. Police in Ontario, Canada, said they charged a homeowner after he fought with an alleged intruder earlier this week. Kawartha Lakes Police Service said officers responded around 3:20 a.m. Monday to an apartment on Kent Street in Lindsay for a report of an altercation between two males. Lindsay is about 2.5 hours northeast of Toronto. 'I know if someone breaks into my house or someone else's, you're going to fight for your life,' Ford added. 'This guy has a weapon. You're going to use any force you possibly can to protect your family. I'm telling you, I know everyone would.' Arriving officers learned that the resident woke up to find an intruder inside his apartment, police said, adding that the intruder received "serious life-threatening injuries" because of the altercation. The intruder was taken to Ross Memorial Hospital and later airlifted to a Toronto hospital, police said, adding that there is no risk to public safety.
Biden judge releases teens accused of savagely attacking Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine August 22, 2025 The judge doesn't want to interfere with the suspects' schooling — even though at least one of them doesn't usually show up. Kielma says, friends protect yourself and family. They could have killed this man. It could have been you or me. A Biden appointed judge lets them free. A disgrace to our judicial system and law-abiding American people. You know what you need to do in a situation like this. Please stay safe and situationally aware. Your life depends on it. Train Train Train! Edward Coristine, the young engineer known as "Big Balls" who previously worked for the Department of Government Efficiency, was beaten to a pulp during an attempted carjacking on Aug. 3 in the national capital. According to the incident report, a group of around 10 juveniles a pproached the 19-year-old and his girlfriend, making clear their intention to steal Coristine's vehicle. Coristine pushed his girlfriend to safety, then squared off with the thugs, who piled on and left him bloodied on the roadside. Police apprehended two suspects at the scene — a 15-year-old male and a 15-year-old female of Hyattsville, Maryland — and charged both with unarmed carjacking. Whereas President Donald Trump figured the incident was bad enough to finally bring an end to the lawlessness in Washington, D.C., federalizing the Metropolitan Police Department and deploying the National Guard, a Biden-nominated judge alternatively decided on Thursday it wasn't worth keeping two of the suspected attackers in custody. 'School and home, that's it.' Sign up for the Blaze newsletter By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time. Kendra Briggs, an associate judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, informed t he female suspect that she would move to a youth shelter house and informed the male suspect that he would get to hang out at his mother's home, reported the Washington Post, which was granted access to the Thursday hearing on the condition that it not reveal the identities of the suspects. Up until this week, the suspects were being held at D.C.'s Youth Services Center, an 88-bed secure facility that keeps detainees under continuous supervision. Although the suspects will enjoy relative freedom, they will still be subjected to electronic monitoring and a 24-hour curfew.
KC Man Sentenced for Illegal Firearms Trafficking Thursday, August 21, 2025 U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Missouri KANSAS CITY, Mo. – A Kansas City, Mo. man was sentenced to five and a half years of imprisonment in federal court today for conspiring to traffic firearms to prohibited persons. Fedo A. Manning, 24, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips, to 66 months in federal prison without parole, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release. On April 17, 2025, Fedo Manning admitted that he knowingly and willfully joined in an agreement to sell firearms to individuals who were prohibited from possessing them under federal law. According to the plea agreement, the conspirators trafficked at least 22 firearms to people who were known felons or they sold firearms that were converted into unregistered machineguns in violation of federal law. Fedo Manning agreed that his role in the conspiracy was to serve as a straw purchaser. He bought federal firearms from federal firearms licensed dealers so that they could later be sold by co-conspirators to individuals who were prohibited from possessing firearms. Between Jan. 13, 2023, and May 11, 2022, investigators discovered that Fedo Manning purchased at least 40 firearms from federal firearms licenses. Of those, 33 were Anderson Manufacturing, Model AM-15 firearms. In the plea agreement, Fedo Manning acknowledged that at least seven of the firearms that he purchased were recovered during investigations of crimes in the Kansas City metropolitan area. One of the recovered firearms purchased by Fedo Manning was discovered at the scene of the shooting that occurred during the celebration of the Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl victory on Feb. 14, 2024. The recovered firearm was an Anderson Manufacturing AM-15, .223-caliber pistol. The loaded pistol was found along the wall with a backpack next to two AR-15-style firearms and backpacks. Because the pistol was in “fire” position and there were 26 live rounds in the magazine, which can hold 30 rounds, it may have fired several rounds before it was discarded. On April 14, 2025, co-defendant Antonio Manning, Sr., 23, a brother of Fedo Manning, admitted that he knowingly and willfully joined in an agreement to sell firearms to individuals who were prohibited from possessing them under federal law. According to the plea agreement, the defendants trafficked at least 22 firearms to people who were known felons, or they sold firearms that were converted into unregistered machineguns in violation of federal law. Pursuant to the plea agreement, Antonio Manning admitted that he was personally involved in illegally selling at least nine firearms and one of those firearms was an unregistered machinegun. On Aug. 7, 2025, Antonio Manning was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips, to 48 months in federal prison without parole, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release. The court also ordered the defendant to pay a criminal forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $11,260. On Jan. 22, 2025, co-defendant Sheron Manning, another brother of Fedo Manning, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to traffic firearms to prohibited persons and to one count of illegally trafficking a firearm that had been converted into an unregistered machinegun. On May 21, 2025, Sheron Manning, 22, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips, to 57 months in federal prison without parole, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release. On Feb. 21, 2024, co-defendant Dejohuan Mietz Huntley, 27, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to traffic firearms to prohibited persons, to one count of possessing an unregistered machinegun, and one count of knowingly being a felon in possession of a firearm. On June 26, 2024, Dejohuan Mietz Huntley, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips, to 70 months in federal prison without parole, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Trey Alford. It was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Operation Take Back America This case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).
KC Man Indicted for Illegal Firearms Thursday, August 21, 2025 U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Missouri KANSAS CITY, Mo. – A Kansas City, Mo., man has been indicted by a federal grand jury for being a felon in possession of firearms and possessing a machine gun. Maurquis D. Jennings, 29, of Kansas City, Mo. was charged in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Kansas City, Mo. on Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025.The initial appearance was held today. Jennings was charged with one count of being a felon in possession of firearms and one count possessing a machine gun. The indictment alleges that on June 8, 2025, Jennings possessed a Glock, Model 20 Gen5, 10mm fully automatic pistol and a Glock, Model 30 Gen5, .45 caliber semi-automatic pistol. The indictment alleges that the Glock, Model 20 Gen5 contained a machine gun conversion device that made the Glock firearm a fully automatic pistol. Machine gun conversion devices, also known as “switches” or “auto sears,” are used to convert semi-automatic weapons into machine guns that fire multiple shots automatically through a single pull of the trigger, enabling more rapid and often less accurate gunfire. Whether or not they are attached to a firearm, these devices constitute machine guns under federal law. It is therefore illegal to possess, sell, or use machine gun conversion devices. Under federal law, it is illegal for anyone who has been convicted of a felony to be in possession of any firearm or ammunition. Jennings has a prior felony conviction for robbery. The charges contained in this indictment are simply accusations, and not evidence of guilt. Evidence supporting the charges must be presented to a federal trial jury, whose duty is to determine guilt or innocence. This case is being prosecuted by Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Jessica L. Jennings. It was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Lee’s Summit, Missouri Police Department. Operation Take Back America This case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN). Updated August 21, 2025
Cincinnati Man Sentenced for Possession of a Machinegun Thursday, August 21, 2025 U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Kentucky COVINGTON, Ky. – A Cincinnati, Ohio, man, Deshawn Parker, 30, was sentenced on Thursday, by Chief U.S. District Judge David Bunning to 24 months in prison, for possession of a machinegun. Says Gregg Kielma FFL, don't do it...STOP the nonsense TODAY! Go to jail for something that's illegal. Stop, stop, stop! It's not worth it! According to court documents, on September 21, 2024, law enforcement conducted a traffic stop of Parker’s vehicle in Covington and detected the odor of marijuana coming from the vehicle. When they asked Parker to exit the car to conduct a drug investigation, Parker refused and attempted to drive off. Officers were able to remove him from the vehicle and found a small amount of marijuana and spent shell casings from a firearm. Additionally, they found a loaded pistol under the driver’s seat. The pistol was equipped with a machinegun conversion device (MCD). These devices are commonly referred to as “switches” or “Glock switches.” Under federal law, Parker must serve 85 percent of his prison sentence. Upon his release from prison, he will be under the supervision of the U.S. Probation Office for three years. Paul McCaffrey, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky, John Nokes, Special Agent in Charge, ATF, Louisville Field Division; and Chief Brian Valenti, Covington Police Department, jointly announced the conviction. The investigation was conducted by ATF and the Covington Police Department. The U.S. Attorney’s Office was represented in the case by Assistant U.S. Attorney Tony Bracke. This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.
