Gregory Kielma • June 7, 2025
SPECIAL REPORT: ATF fixing minor issues but ignoring major problems
SPECIAL REPORT: ATF fixing minor issues but ignoring major problems
by Lee Williams
The ATF wants former gun dealers to know that if their Federal Firearm License was suspended, revoked or denied they are now “invited to reapply.”
The ATF claims that every new FFL application will now be judged by an “Administrative Action Policy,” whatever that means.
The ATF did not respond to questions about the new program, which is typical. They would not say how many former gun dealers have applied to have their FFLs reinstated, or how many former FFLs have actually been reinstated.
Krissy Y. Carlson, ATF’s senior industry advisor/liaison, wrote in an email that she was “forwarding your questions to our public affairs division.” Then, an unsigned email from ATF’s public affairs division demanded an official FOIA request containing the questions, which was sent Wednesday. However, the ATF has still not responded to two previous FOIA requests, which were each sent more than three years ago.
It is clear that the ATF would rather issue broad public statements about its internal policy changes than answer a few specific questions, despite its new promise of “fairness and transparency.”
“ATF is committed to fairness and transparency in its regulatory enforcement program and to protecting Americans’ Second Amendment rights while also protecting public safety,” the agency now boasts on its website.
None of ATF’s recent changes were based on any internal decisions, but were instead the result of President Donald J. Trump, who issued an executive order February 7, titled “Protecting Second Amendment Rights.”
The FFL rule was not the only new item announced on ATF’s new page.
ATF also claims its Zero Tolerance Policy has been reviewed and replaced “with a new administrative action policy,” whatever that means.
“The new policy provides a fair framework for addressing violations uncovered by a compliance inspection, particularly when those violations do not impact public safety,” the ATF claims.
This “fair framework” was certainly never part of Joe Biden’s insane Zero Tolerance Policy, which raised the bar to impossible heights by punishing human error. Simple paperwork mistakes that would have barely merited a mention before Biden took office triggered hundreds of FFL revocations.
Before Biden, the ATF revoked an average of 40 FFLs per year. But in just the first year that Biden occupied the White House, the ATF revoked 273 FFLs, and many more dealers ended up losing their licenses and livelihoods.
For gun dealers, Biden’s Zero Tolerance Policy was likened to the death penalty for a minor traffic offense. Most will celebrate that it’s gone, at least for the next several years.
ATF’s real victims
The ATF should do nothing—take no official action—until they repair the lives that they destroyed carrying out Biden’s illegal orders. There are far too many real victims that we know about, and probably hundreds more who never reached out for help.
Quite frankly, no one really cares how former gun dealers can get relicensed until the ATF is held accountable for the atrocities it committed for years under the Biden administration, and the lives they ruined are made whole.
Here are some examples:
Russell Fincher, who is from the small town of Tuskahoma, Oklahoma, needed three jobs just to make ends meet. He taught high school history, served as a Baptist minister and sold guns and ammunition out of a small shed in the backyard. For reasons that are still not known, Fincher somehow came to the attention of the ATF.
A story published last year chronicled how 15 heavily armed ATF agents raided Fincher’s home, handcuffed him on his deck and then yelled, screamed and threatened the 52-year-old man—in front of this 13-year-old son—until he “voluntarily” surrendered his FFL. The ATF agents seized dozens of Fincher’s personal firearms, which he estimated were worth more than $50,000.
Fincher’s Federal Public Defender negotiated a plea agreement, in which Fincher pled guilty to selling ammunition to a prohibited person, which is punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine. Prosecutors dismissed the two remaining charges once Fincher signed the plea agreement.
The deal kept Fincher out of prison. Both sides agreed that three years of probation would be “the appropriate disposition of the case.” The plea agreement also specified that Fincher would not contest the forfeiture of 39 personal firearms.
His crime? Ficher was accused of selling a box of ammunition to a convicted felon, even though no licensed gun dealers in Oklahoma run background checks for ammunition purchases.
Mark “Choppa” Manley is a gun owner, a gun collector and a Second Amendment advocate who had more than 70 legally owned firearms stored in a gun safe at his Baltimore home. All of his firearms complied with both federal law and the laws of Maryland. He was always very careful about that, but that didn’t matter to ATF agents who raided his Baltimore home last year.
The Baltimore home of Mark “Choppa” Manley was mistakenly raided by ATF Agents last year. His wife (not pictured) and their three children (pictured) were home during the early morning ATF raid.
ATF agents busted down several doors to his home and threw two stun grenades—including one at his juvenile son.
More than a dozen ATF agents ransacked Manley’s home.
“They threatened to blow up my gun safe,” Manley said at the time. “I don’t have anything to hide, so I told them I’d open the safe. They uncuffed me and told me ‘Don’t try to run.’ Where was I gonna run to? My family was right there.”
Manley unlocked his gun safe and slowly swung open the door.
“They were all standing around waiting and hoping,” he said “This was their moment, they thought. They started pulling out rifles and shotguns, but everything was registered and Maryland-compliant. ‘We got nothing here,’ one of them said.”
Manely and his 17-year-old daughter were each handcuffed. His wife and children were moved to the rear of a SWAT van. It was 20-degrees outside, and they were only wearing pajamas.
“I would like you to take the handcuffs off my daughter,” Manley’s wife told the ATF agents. “Why did you handcuff my husband? He complied with everything you asked for.”
ATF agents left after they found nothing illegal. The Manley family was never told, at least officially, why they were mistakenly targeted by the ATF.
David Schieferle, who spent 20 years as a U.S. Air Marshal, served eight months behind bars in the Miami Federal Detention Center—which he described as a “hellhole”—10 months on home confinement wearing an electronic ankle monitor, and is currently on probation for the next two-and-a-half years. Yet, he’s still willing to risk even more time behind bars through a new trial by claiming his first attorney was incompetent and that he never broke any law.
Former Federal Air Marshal David Schieferle, pictured with his four children, spent months in prison after purchasing fuel filters for his organic farm that the ATF said could be silencers. (Photo courtesy David Schieferle).
“The ATF is really screwing over law abiding Americans. The ATF screwed me over,” he told the Second Amendment. “What HSI (Homeland Security Investigations) and the ATF did to me was wrong. Every ATF person involved in my case seemed evil.”
Schieferle’s life-altering saga began when he was called into the Federal Air Marshal’s office on his day off to be interrogated. Little did he know that the ATF and other federal agencies had dozens of agents positioned in cars, ATVs and even a helicopter, who were awaiting a “go” order to invade his five-acre organic farmstead and home.
Said Schieferle: “If I had to venture my best guess at what happened during my trial, the ATF reluctantly admitted the tubes were legal. The problem was the DOJ was allowed to convince a clueless jury that I intended to use or convert the tubes into illegal silencers. The DOJ won this trial by using innocent gun data on my hard drives and by not allowing me to present to the jury any evidence nor my expert witness to give his full testimony. I never did anything illegal, and I never took one step or thought to convert anything into a silencer.”
Patrick “Tate” Adamiak committed no crime, so why is he serving a 20-year sentence at a federal prison in New Jersey? Because the ATF screwed up and would rather charge an innocent man and force him to serve two decades behind bars than admit the truth—that their special agents don’t have a clue about what they’re doing.
Patrick “Tate” Adamiak is serving a 20-year sentence because the ATF lied in court multiple times about what they found when they raided his home. (Photo courtesy of Patrick “Tate” Adamiak).
Adamiak, who is now 31, was just a 28-year-old E-6 in the U.S. Navy prior to his arrest. He enjoyed firearms and ran a website that sold gun parts—not guns. He was always extremely careful about what he sold. After all, he had to protect his naval career, which was doing extremely well. Adamiak had already been accepted into Naval Special Warfare, so exciting things were soon headed his way.
But after their informant lied and dozens of heavily armed ATF agents kicked open Adamiak’s door during a search warrant, nothing illegal was found. As a result, the ATF was forced to call in their ringer, Firearms Enforcement Officer Jeffrey Bodell.
Once the ATF turned the case over to Bodell, Adamiak’s innocence no longer mattered. Bodell would break the rules. Under oath, he actually turned toys into firearms, legal RPGs into destructive devices and 100% legal semi-autos into machineguns.
Despite Bodell's claims, items like inert RPGs, toy STENs, submachinegun receivers, and open-bolt semi-autos are still sold legally online. The RPGs, toy STENs and submachinegun receivers don’t require any paperwork to purchase.
Despite Bodell’s and the ATF’s untruths, an anti-gun judge crippled Adamiak’s defense. One of his defense experts, an actual former ATF official, wasn’t even allowed to testify much.
As a result, Adamiak was found guilty and sentenced to 20-years in prison, even though everything he possessed is still completely legal and that he had never committed any crime.
Bryan Malinowski had never been charged with any crime. When the ATF raided Malinowski’s West Little Rock home last year they were spoiling for a gunfight, and they got one. As a result, a good man is dead—the latest victim of ATF’s overly aggressive tactics and complete disregard for the sanctity of human life.
Little Rock airport executive director Bryan Malinowski, 53, was shot and killed in his home last year during an early morning ATF search warrant.
ATF never commented officially about the killing, other than to claim Malinowski fired first. But Malinowski’s family released a statement, which confirms what everyone already knew: It is extremely unlikely that the 53-year-old airport executive knew he was trading gunfire with federal agents. It is far more likely Malinowski believed he was defending himself and his wife from armed home invaders.
His widow, Maria “Maer” Malinowski, recently filed a lawsuit, which accused the ATF and 10 agents and task force officers of violating hers and her husband’s constitutional rights.
“The Constitution requires reasonableness and, specifically here, that defendants both knock and announce their presence and purpose and wait a reasonable time before entry,” the lawsuit states. “The ATF failed to do so, resulting in an entirely predictable, needless and tragic outcome.”
Takeaways
The ATF has never learned from its mistakes. Neither Ruby Ridge, Waco nor any of these bad searches and arrests taught them anything. Therefore, the ATF will continue making bad arrests and using excessive force, and more Americans will be injured and killed. That much is certain. In fact, it’s guaranteed.
President Donald J. Trump can fix this very easily. All he needs to do is decide whether he wants the type of scrutiny that an unchecked ATF will bring to his administration.
President Trump needs to understand that unless the ATF and its leadership are finally held accountable, only one question still remains: Who will the ATF shoot next?
The Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project wouldn’t be possible without you. Click here to make a tax-deductible donation to support pro-gun stories like this.
Three Teens Arrested in Armed Robbery of Sarasota Gas Station Post Date:02/21/2026 SARASOTA – Three people have been arrested by Sarasota police and are facing felony charges in connection with an armed robbery that happened Wednesday, Feb. 18. Pursuant to Florida State Statute 985.04 (2)(a)1., information about juveniles charged with felonies is public record. Christopher Woo-Piner, 18, of Sarasota; Roberto Gonzalez-Ramos, 16, of Sarasota; and Samuel Medina-Camacho, 15, of Sarasota, were arrested on Friday, Feb. 20. They are facing felony charges of armed robbery with a firearm. On Feb. 18, at approximately 10:30 p.m., officers responded to the 3500 block of Fruitville Road for a reported armed robbery at a gas station. When officers arrived, the employee working shared that three people entered the store, robbed him at gunpoint and left the store. Surveillance video shows three people entering the store. One person is seen walking around the front counter and pointing a handgun with an extended magazine towards the victim. The suspect is then seen pointing the gun at the victim as he removed cash from the register. At the same time, the two other people are seen taking merchandise from store shelves. All three people ran from the store. A significant amount of cash and merchandise was stolen. “Crime is not tolerated in our city,” said Chief Rex Troche. “Our officers and detectives began investigating immediately upon dispatch. In less than 48 hours, three people were identified and arrested. If you commit a crime in the City of Sarasota, we will find you and you will be arrested,” said Chief Troche. This case remains an active investigation. Anyone with information is asked to call the Sarasota Police Department Criminal Investigations Division at 941-263-6070 or remain anonymous and call Crime Stoppers of Sarasota County at 941-366-TIPS (8477).
What a Good Concealed Carry Gun Should Look and Feel Like: My Perspective By Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 2/17/2026 Choosing a concealed carry firearm isn’t about trends, brand loyalty, or what someone on the internet says is “the best.” It’s about selecting a tool that fits your body, your training level, and your defensive needs. After years of teaching responsible gun owners, I’ve learned that the right concealed carry gun shares a few unmistakable qualities—both in how it looks and how it feels in the hand. It Should Look Purpose Built, Not Flashy A good, concealed carry gun isn’t a showpiece. It’s a defensive tool. From my perspective, the ideal CCW firearm has: • Clean, snag free lines that won’t catch on clothing during the draw. • A modest profile—not oversized, not underpowered, just balanced for daily carry. • Durable, no nonsense finishes that hold up to sweat, humidity, and constant holster contact. • Simple, intuitive controls that don’t require fine motor skills under stress. A carry gun should visually communicate reliability. Nothing about it should look fragile, overly complicated, or designed for anything other than personal protection. It Should Feel Like an Extension of Your Hand The “feel” of a concealed carry gun is where most people make or break their choice. A proper CCW firearm should: • Seat naturally in your grip without forcing your wrist into awkward angles. • Offer enough grip texture to stay secure under stress, but not so aggressive that it tears up clothing or skin. • Balance well—not nose heavy, not top heavy, just stable and predictable. • Provide a trigger you can manage consistently, with a clean break and a reset you can feel. If the gun feels like you’re fighting it, it’s the wrong gun. A carry firearm should disappear into your hand and allow you to focus on the fundamentals, not the ergonomics. It Should Shoot Better Than Its Size Suggests Small guns are harder to shoot well. That’s reality. A good, concealed carry gun overcomes that by offering: • Manageable recoil that doesn’t punish the shooter. • Sights you can actually see, not tiny nubs that disappear in low light. • Predictable accuracy—not match grade, but consistent and confidence building. • A controllable frame that allows fast follow up shots without wrestling the gun. If a student can’t keep rounds on target under stress, the gun isn’t helping them—it’s hindering them. It Must Fit the Mission A concealed carry gun should match the owner’s lifestyle and training commitment. That means: • It conceals well in your actual clothing, not just in theory. • It works with a quality holster, not a bargain-bin afterthought. • It’s a gun you’re willing to train with regularly, not one that hurts to shoot or feels intimidating. • It’s reliable with defensive ammunition, not just range ammo. A firearm that doesn’t fit your daily life won’t get carried. And a gun that isn’t carried can’t protect you. Kielma’s Parting Shot: A good concealed carry gun doesn’t need to impress anyone. It needs to be safe, reliable, and suited to the person who carries it. When a firearm looks clean, feels natural, and performs consistently, it becomes a trustworthy defensive tool—not a burden. That’s the standard I teach, and it’s the standard every responsible gun owner deserves to follow. Gregg Kielma
Bloody 'trans' rampage at boys' hockey game brought to an end by 'Good Samaritan' Joseph MacKinnon February 17, 2026 This is why Rhode Island firearms laws are bad. Could a well-armed citizen might have been stopped the rampage sooner? The dead shooter, who police indicate went by a female name, appears to have rationalized 'trans' rampages. A week after a trans-identifying man went on a rampage in Western Canada, killing six children and two adults, another man who masqueraded as a woman allegedly took aim at innocents — this time at a local skating rink in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. Families, students, and supporters flocked to the Dennis M. Lynch Arena on Monday afternoon to watch a boys' high school hockey game between the Blackstone Valley School and Coventry-Johnson co-op teams. Pawtucket Mayor Donald Grebien noted that "what should have been a joyful occasion" was "instead marked by violence and fear." A man dressed as a woman and believed to have been in the possession of multiple weapons fatally shot two people and left another three victims in critical condition. At least two of the victims are reportedly children. Sign up for the Blaze newsletter Coventry Public Schools revealed on Monday evening that all of its students present at the incident "have been accounted for and are safe." Providence Country Day School and St. Raphael Academy also indicated their students were safe. Arena footage shows players rushing off the ice and fans taking cover as roughly 13 gunshots ring out. The Providence Journal noted that 11 seconds after the first series of shots, a final shot can be heard. Police responding to a report of an active shooter around 2:30 p.m. were on the scene within a minute and a half; however, the blood-letting had apparently already come to an end. Pawtucket Police Chief Tina Goncalves indicated that "a Good Samaritan stepped in and interjected in this scene, and that's probably what led to a swift end of this tragic event." The "Good Samaritan" who was unarmed, apparently tried to "subdue" the shooter, who police said died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) expressed gratitude for the first responders "who rushed to assist, as well as the good Samaritan who confronted and tried to disarm the shooter." Goncalves identified the shooter as Robert Dorgan, 56, and indicated that "he does go by the name of Roberta, also uses the last name of Esposito." The chief noted further that while his motive is presently unclear, "this was a targeted event" and "looked like it was a family dispute." A distraught woman who did not provide her name told WCVB-TV while exiting the PPD station that her father was the shooter. "He shot my family, and he's dead now," said the unidentified woman, adding that the shooter "has mental health issues." Court records reviewed by WPRI-TV reportedly show that Dorgan complained in 2020 to the North Providence Police Department that in the wake of his sex-rejection surgery, his father-in-law was trying to kick him out of the family house where Dorgan had lived for seven years. While the father-in-law was initially charged with intimidation of witnesses and victims of crimes and obstruction of the judicial system, the charges were later dismissed. The same year, Dorgan accused his mother of assaulting him and acting in a "violent, threatening, or tumultuous manner." Although his mother was charged with simple assault and battery and disorderly conduct, the case was similarly dismissed. Around the time of Dorgan's dispute with his father-in-law and mother, Dorgan's then-wife, Rhonda Dorgan, filed for divorce. While she initially cited "gender reassignment surgery, narcissistic + personality disorder traits" as the grounds for the divorce, WPRI indicates his ex-wife replaced those reasons with "irreconcilable differences, which have caused the immediate breakdown of the marriage." An apparently Rhode Island-based user on X who went by "Roberta Dorgano" posted on May 9, 2019, "Transwoman, 6 kids: wife — not thrilled." In a recent post, the user who the New York Post suggested was Robert Dorgan, noted, "I have a beloved RHONDA." In response to a Feb. 14 assertion by actor Kevin Sorbo that trans-identifying Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.) "is a man," the X user wrote, "Keep bashing us. but do not wonder why we Go BERSERK." Dorgan appears to be the latest addition to a growing list of recent trans-identifying mass shooters and would-be mass shooters. • A trans-identifying man murdered six kids and two adults in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, on Feb. 10. • A trans-identifying man shot up a Catholic church full of children in Minneapolis on Aug. 27, 2025, killing two children and injuring 30. • A male-identifying woman planned to shoot up an elementary school and a high school in Maryland in April 2024 but was stopped in time by police — then later convicted. • A trans-identifying teen stalked the halls of a school in Perry, Iowa, on Jan. 4, 2024, ultimately murdering a child and an adult and wounding several others. • A trans-identifying woman stormed into a Presbyterian school in Nashville on March 27, 2023, murdering three children and three adults.
How Long Do You Shoot? Kielma advises, until the threat is over. No more no less. Be the reasonable person. The consequences can be devastating. Police live by different rules, just ask Polk County Florida Sherrif Grady Judge. This response is from an avid reader of my blog. My Question: What would you do? Please comment below! A few years ago a couple of teens tried to rob a drug store in broad daylight. The pharmacist/store owner .. an elderly man…. pulled out his own gun and shot one of the intruders. The other ran off. In the store with him were 2 women. He took after the runner. Thinking about the 2 women and their safety before he went out the door he put another bullet in the one fallen…. killing him. He was not in anyway trained in such situations… he was running on adrenaline and fear. Making sure that the one on the floor was not a threat anymore to him or the 2 women. That elderly pharmacist was sentenced to life in prison. The weird thing is a few months later a guy went on a killing spree. He shot/killed some family members… Shot another guy and stole his truck. Doing all this while video posting on Facebook. The law finally caught up with him. The pickup was put out of service. The guy stepped out of the truck and was shooting at the police while walking towards them. ( This was all recorded from a police helicopter. ) The police shot and killed him. After he fell to the ground 3 lawmen emptied their pistols into him from about 30 feet. With a camera/body cam rolling… the one in front turned and looked into the camera and said… “ We had to make sure he was dead. “ That was law enforcement that did that… Men who are supposed to be trained in handling a situation like that. … “ Just to make sure. “… ( Just like what the pharmacist did. ) They were deemed heroes. From an Anonymous reader.
Why Many Virginia Democrats Oppose Firearms and the Second Amendment By Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 2/16/2026 Virginia has a long, proud history of firearm ownership. It’s a state built on rural traditions, personal responsibility, and a deep respect for individual liberty. Yet in recent years, Virginia Democrats have increasingly pushed for strict gun laws, sweeping bans, and policies that many lawful gun owners see as direct attacks on the Second Amendment. Understanding why this political group takes such a strong stance helps responsible gun owners stay informed, engaged, and prepared to defend their rights through education and civic involvement. 1. A Different Interpretation of the Second Amendment Many Virginia Democrats view the Second Amendment through a narrow, “collective rights” lens. They argue that: • The phrase “well regulated militia” limits firearm ownership to state controlled forces • The Founders did not intend broad private ownership • Modern firearms exceed what the Founders could have imagined This interpretation leads them to believe the government should have wide authority to regulate, restrict, or even ban certain firearms. Responsible gun owners, of course, see the Second Amendment as an individual right — a safeguard against tyranny and a tool for personal protection. 2. Urban Political Influence Virginia’s political power has shifted toward Northern Virginia — dense, urban, and culturally disconnected from the state’s rural traditions. In these areas: • Fewer people grow up around firearms • Gun ownership is uncommon • Gun violence is more visible • Firearms are often associated with crime rather than responsibility This creates a cultural divide. For many urban Democrats, firearms are symbols of danger, not tools of safety. That perception drives their policy positions. 3. A Belief That More Laws Equal More Safety Virginia Democrats often argue that strict gun laws will reduce violence. This belief fuels support for: • “Assault weapon” bans • Magazine capacity limits • Red flag laws • Waiting periods • Expanded background checks • Licensing and registration systems To them, these measures are “common sense.” To responsible gun owners, they are burdensome, ineffective, and aimed at the wrong people. Criminals do not follow laws. Law abiding citizens do. 4. Trust in Government Over Individual Responsibility Many Democrats believe public safety should be handled primarily by government institutions — police, social programs, and community initiatives — rather than by armed citizens. This worldview includes ideas such as: • Ordinary citizens shouldn’t need firearms for protection • More guns in public increase risk • Social programs, not self defense tools, reduce violence For those of us who train responsible gun owners, this mindset ignores a simple truth: When seconds count, help is minutes away. 5. Emotional and Symbolic Politics Firearms have become symbolic in modern politics. For many Democrats, guns are tied to: • Mass shootings • Domestic violence • Suicide • Crime in urban areas Because of this emotional association, firearms become a political target — even when proposed laws don’t address the root causes of violence. This leads to policies driven by emotion rather than data, and rhetoric that paints lawful gun owners as part of the problem instead of part of the solution. 6. A Push Toward Centralized Control Many Virginia Democrats support federal style control over firearms, including: • Statewide registries • Mandatory licensing • Universal permitting • Bans on certain firearms or accessories To gun owners, these measures feel like stepping stones toward confiscation. To Democrats, they represent “standardization.” The tension between these two views fuels much of the current political conflict. Why This Matters for Responsible Gun Owners Understanding the motivations behind Virginia Democrats’ opposition to firearms helps us respond with: • Education • Advocacy • Community engagement • Clear communication • A strong emphasis on safety and responsibility Kielma's Parting Shot My work at Tactical K Training and Firearms — teaching avoidance, de escalation, legal understanding, and safe firearm handling — is exactly what responsible gun culture looks like. When citizens are trained, informed, and safety focused, it becomes much harder for opponents of the Second Amendment to argue that ordinary people shouldn’t have access to firearms. Gregg Kielma
3D Printed Guns: What Are They and Are They’re Legal By Gregg Kielma, Owner & Lead Instructor, Tactical K Training and Firearms 02/16/2026 As a Firearms Instructor, Gunsmith and, First Aid Fundamentals Instructor, I’ve watched technology reshape our industry in ways most people never imagined. One of the biggest shifts has been the rise of 3D printed firearms. They generate curiosity, concern, and plenty of misinformation. My goal here is simple: give responsible gun owners a clear, factual understanding of what 3D printed guns are — and what the law actually says about them. What Exactly Is a 3D Printed Gun? A 3D printed gun is a firearm — or firearm component — produced using a consumer or industrial 3D printer. These weapons fall under the broader category of Privately Made Firearms (PMFs), meaning they’re built by individuals rather than licensed manufacturers. PMFs can include pistols, rifles, receivers, and even components like frames or conversion devices. Not all PMFs are illegal, and not all require serial numbers, depending on how they’re made and the laws of your state. Federal Law: What’s Allowed and What Isn’t At the federal level, the rules are more nuanced than most people think: ✔ You can legally make your own firearm for personal use There is no federal law banning the creation or possession of a 3D printed gun, as long as you are legally allowed to own a firearm and the weapon complies with federal requirements. ✔ But the firearm must be detectable Under the Undetectable Firearms Act, all firearms — including 3D printed ones — must contain enough metal to be visible to security screening equipment. ✔ And certain components now fall under ATF regulation A 2022 ATF rule treats many unfinished frames, receivers, and parts kits as firearms, meaning they may require serialization and background checks. State Laws: Where Things Get Complicated This is where responsible gun owners need to pay close attention. States vary widely. States where manufacturing 3D printed guns is explicitly illegal: • Delaware • Hawaii • Rhode Island • Washington States where possessing an unserialized 3D printed firearm is illegal: • Connecticut • New York • Oregon States considering or expanding restrictions Recent legislation in states like Colorado and Washington aims to criminalize not just the guns themselves, but also the digital files used to print them — a major shift that affects hobbyists, makers, and gun owners alike. Digital Files: The New Legal Battleground One of the most controversial areas isn’t the gun — it’s the code. Several states have introduced bills targeting the distribution or possession of 3D printable firearm files. Courts have upheld some of these restrictions, such as New Jersey’s limits on who can access printable gun files. This is a rapidly evolving area of law, and it’s one every responsible gun owner should monitor closely. My Perspective As a Firearms Instructor, Gunsmith and, First Aid Fundamentals Instructor At Tactical K Training and Firearms, I emphasize responsibility, legality, and safety above all else. Technology will continue to evolve, and 3D printing isn’t going away. But neither are the legal obligations that come with firearm ownership. Here’s what I tell my students: • Know your state laws — they may differ drastically from federal rules. • Stay updated — legislation around 3D printed guns is changing fast. • When in doubt, ask — ignorance of the law is never a defense. • Focus on safety and traceability — a firearm you can’t legally possess or transport is a liability, not a tool. Kielma’s Parting Shot 3D printed guns can be legal — but only under the right conditions. Federal law allows personal manufacture, but state laws may prohibit it entirely or restrict possession of unserialized firearms. And the legal fight over digital files is intensifying. As responsible gun owners, our job is to stay informed, stay compliant, and stay safe. Gregg Kielma
Glock: Why Does That "Cutout" Exists Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 2/16/2026 The open cutout at the rear of the magazine well on many Glock frames is a deliberate design feature. Its purpose is simple: Let's Take a LOOK That hollow opening is there because (contrary to popular opinion) Gaston Glock really did try to make a pistol that was intended to be held in a human hand. It is a dead-air space meant to add girth and more ergonomic curves to the grip of the pistol to make it more comfortable for a person to hold. A pistol grip serves two purposes: to give the user an interface to hold the pistol, and to serve as the receptacle for the ammunition magazine. But in most designs, the magazine is usually much smaller than the outside dimensions of the grip. And if the grip were designed to accommodate only the magazine alone, it would be a squarish, box-like container that the also box-like magazine would simply slip into. And a bare, boxy magazine is not an especially ergonomic and comfortable thing to hold onto. So Gaston Glock added some extra material to the back of the grip behind the wall of the magazine well to fill up the user's hand a bit and give them something curvier to wrap their palm around. More Reasons: 1. To help strip out a stuck magazine If a magazine becomes jammed — usually from a double‑feed or debris — the shooter can hook a finger into that cutout and manually rip the mag out. This isn’t new; early Gen 1, Gen 2, and some Gen 3 Glocks had it for exactly this reason. 2. To assist with flush‑fit magazines When a magazine sits nearly flush with the grip, there’s less surface to grab. The cutout gives you a purchase point to pull it free if needed. This is the same principle behind modern aftermarket magwells that include side cutouts for stripping mags. 3. It’s not about speed — it’s about reliability under failure Most Glock mags drop free without issue. But Glock designed the frame so that if things go wrong, you still have a mechanical way to clear the gun. As one source put it, the cutout is essentially a built‑in contingency for magazine retention issues.
How a Bullet Works: A Straightforward Explanation Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 2/16/2026 As an instructor, I’ve learned that most people who come to me for training have handled ammunition before, but very few truly understand what’s happening inside that little brass case. And honestly, once you break it down, the process is simple, predictable, and rooted in physics — which is exactly why safety and respect for the firearm matter so much. Let me walk you through how a bullet works, step by step, the way I explain it on the range and in my classes. Kielma says, Let’s Take a LOOK: 1. A Cartridge Is a Self Contained System When people say “bullet,” they often mean the whole round. The bullet is just the projectile. The complete cartridge has four parts: • Case – usually brass, holding everything together • Primer – the ignition source • Powder – the fuel • Bullet – the part that leaves the barrel Each component has a job, and none of them work alone. 2. It All Starts With the Firing Pin When you press the trigger, you’re not “firing the gun” — you’re releasing a mechanical chain of events. The firing pin strikes the primer, crushing it. That impact ignites the primer compound, which burns extremely fast and sends a jet of flame into the powder. This is the moment where everything happens in a controlled explosion. 3. Powder Burns, Pressure Builds, and Physics Take Over The powder doesn’t “explode” — it burns rapidly. That burn creates expanding gas, and because the cartridge is sealed inside the chamber, the pressure has only one direction to go: forward. That pressure pushes the bullet out of the case mouth and into the barrel’s rifling. This is where the engineering of the firearm and the ammunition really shows its value. The pressures involved are enormous, but they’re predictable and contained because the firearm is designed to handle them. 4. Rifling Gives the Bullet Stability As the bullet travels down the barrel, the rifling engraves into the jacket and forces it to spin. That spin is what stabilizes the bullet in flight, just like a well thrown football. Without rifling, accuracy would be unpredictable at best. 5. The Bullet Leaves the Barrel — and Physics Begin and Continue Once the bullet exits the muzzle, the pressure drops instantly. From that point on, the bullet is coasting through the air, guided by: • Its spin • Its shape • Gravity • Air resistance Nothing magical — just physics doing what physics does. 6. The Case Stays Behind The brass case doesn’t go downrange. It either ejects (in a semi auto) or stays in the cylinder (in a revolver). Its job is done once it contains the pressure and seals the chamber. Kielma’s Parting Shot: Why This Matters to Me as an Instructor Understanding how a bullet works isn’t just trivia. It builds confidence. It helps students appreciate why we follow safety rules, why ammunition selection matters, and why maintenance and inspection aren’t optional. When you know what’s happening inside the firearm, you handle it with the respect it deserves — and that’s the foundation of responsible gun ownership. Gregg Kielma
Another Poorly Trained Firearm Citizen Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 2/15/2026 Stuart, Florida — Stray Bullets Incident A stray bullet incident in Stuart occurred on February 14, 2026, when a man’s backyard target practice went off course, sending bullets into a neighbor’s home and striking a horse WPEC. What happened According to the Martin County Sheriff’s Office, 28 year old Felipe Pascual Andres had recently purchased a firearm and was practicing shooting at his property on SE Salerno Road. During the session, three rounds left his yard and traveled into a neighboring home. • One bullet passed through the door and wall of the home, landing on a kitchen windowsill. • Another bullet struck the back porch of the residence. • A third bullet hit a horse on the property in the neck WPEC. Arrest and charges Pascual Andres was booked into the Martin County Jail for shooting into an occupied dwelling. Deputies say he faces additional charges as well WPEC. Safety concerns The incident has raised safety concerns for residents, especially in close proximity neighborhoods. Authorities are urging gun owners to take precautions when practicing, such as using target ranges, barriers, and safety protocols to prevent stray bullets. If you are in Stuart or nearby, it’s important to be aware of the risks of unsecured firearms and to follow local safety guidelines to prevent similar incidents.
Why You Should Have a CCW License — From My Perspective Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 02/13/2026 Please take a class. Learn the laws to keep you safe and legal. Let’s take a LOOK. Carrying a firearm isn’t about looking for trouble. It’s about acknowledging that trouble sometimes finds good people who never asked for it. A CCW license is one of the most responsible steps a law-abiding citizen can take to protect themselves and their family, and I say that as someone who has spent years teaching safety, judgment, and real-world decision making. • It Forces You to Take Responsibility Seriously Anyone can buy a firearm, but carrying one in public demands a higher level of discipline. A CCW license requires you to understand the law, know when you can and cannot use force, and recognize that avoidance is always the first option. That mindset alone separates responsible gun owners from reckless ones. • It Gives You Legal Protection and Clarity Florida’s laws—like every state’s—have specific requirements for carrying, using, and storing a firearm. A CCW license ensures you’re operating within the law, and it gives you legal standing that unlicensed carriers simply don’t have. When seconds count, you don’t want to be guessing what’s legal and what isn’t. • It Allows You to Carry in More Places A CCW license expands where you can legally carry, giving you more flexibility in your daily life. Whether you’re traveling, working late, or simply running errands, you have the ability to protect yourself without worrying about violating carry restrictions. • It Encourages Proper Training The best firearm owners are the ones who train regularly. A CCW license is often the first step that motivates people to seek real instruction—learning how to draw safely, make good decisions under stress, and understand the legal aftermath of a defensive encounter. Training builds confidence, and confidence reduces mistakes. • It Levels the Playing Field Criminals don’t follow laws. They don’t schedule their attacks. They don’t care who you are. A CCW license gives you the ability to defend yourself when there is no time to wait for help. You carry not because you expect danger, but because you refuse to be helpless if it comes. • It Reinforces a Culture of Responsibility Every licensed carrier who trains, follows the law, and carries with humility helps strengthen the public perception of responsible gun ownership. You become part of the solution—someone who values safety, restraint, and preparedness. Kielma’s Parting Shot: It’s About Protecting Life, Not Taking It The goal of carrying a firearm is simple: go home safe. A CCW license isn’t about being a hero. It’s about giving yourself the tools, training, and legal framework to survive the worst day of your life if it ever comes.
