Gregory Kielma • April 13, 2025

DOJ Investigating L.A. County Sheriff’s Department Over CCW Wait Times

DOJ Investigating L.A. County Sheriff’s Department Over CCW Wait Times

Darwin Nercesian

The Department of Justice, under Attorney General Pam Bondi, has launched an investigation into the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department to determine whether the agency violates American’s gun rights via excessive fees and wait times throughout its concealed carry permitting process. The investigation, aimed at defending Californians from alleged abuse of their Second Amendment rights, was announced on Thursday, March 27, as part of an initiative sparked by President Trump’s Executive Order directing Bondi to review Second Amendment laws and infringements across the nation.

In bringing this investigation to light, the DOJ cites a legal challenge to the permitting process in which plaintiffs faced an 18-month delay in receiving concealed carry licenses from the Sheriff’s Department. Referring to California as a “particularly egregious offender” concerning its irreverence and open defiance of the United States Supreme Court’s pro-Second Amendment rulings, including the state’s newly adopted anti-gun legislation further restricting the right to bear arms, the DOJ believes there is likely to be additional cases in which Californians are “experiencing similarly long delays that are unduly burdening, or effectively denying, the Second Amendment rights of the people of Los Angeles.”

“This Department of Justice will not stand idly by while States and localities infringe on the Second Amendment rights of ordinary, law-abiding Americans… The Second Amendment is not a second-class right, and under my watch, the Department will actively enforce the Second Amendment just like it actively enforces other fundamental Constitutional rights,” Bondi said in a statement about the investigation. 

Meanwhile, the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department issued its own statement on Thursday amounting to not much more than “I didn’t do anything.”

“We are committed to processing all Concealed Carry Weapons (CCW) applications in compliance with state and local laws to promote responsible gun ownership… The Department is facing a significant staffing crisis, with only 14 personnel in our CCW Unit, yet we have successfully approved 15,000 CCW applications. Currently, we are diligently working through approximately 4,000 active cases, striving to meet this unfunded mandate,” according to a statement from the department. 

Hogwash. Let’s put this into perspective. California is one of those hammer-and-sickle states that places a waiting time between purchasing and taking possession of a firearm, regardless of instant background check approval. That waiting time is ten days. So, let’s just say a criminal decides to go through the process rather than simply buying their firearm from the back of a van on 8th and Alverado. Then, let’s say he decides he’s going to carry that gun concealed to commit a violent crime when he reaches his destination. Are we really that delusional to think he is going to apply for a permit to transport the gun to his intended target?

He already has the firearm, and how much permission do you think he’ll apply for before taking an innocent life? The answer is none. If an instant NICS check is enough to turn over possession of a firearm, there is no excuse for a burdensome process that takes 18 months to determine whether that individual has the right to carry it. In fact, there is no excuse for a permitting process that takes longer than the background check itself. 

I’d categorize training as a necessity to defend life effectively with lethal force, but that’s not where the months are spent. If the Sheriff’s Department’s claims are correct, the state’s processing requirements are too burdensome and arbitrarily time-consuming, unduly depriving the Constitutionally guaranteed freedom of self-preservation. That is not the citizen’s fault and must not be the individual’s responsibility to wait, but the state’s burden to speed up the process. There was once an idea that the government existed first to defend its people’s liberty. I’m not sure when that changed to government knows best, and what you need are fewer rights. 

Speaking of the types of people driving such an ugly transition to authoritarianism, Jacob Charles, associate professor at Pepperdine Caruso School of Law and self-proclaimed expert on the Second Amendment, says he has not seen this type of DOJ probe before, classified as a pattern-or-practice investigation and typically focused on police misconduct. Charles, another leftist who has lost any grasp of history, reality, and the Constitution, instead blames the Trump administration, calling the investigation “another culture war issue pitting red versus blue” while completely dismissing the daily attacks conservatives and gun owners face from the left.

“This must be seen in the context of Trump attacking law firms, universities, and cities, counties and states who don’t profess fealty to him personally and to his vision… He’s not even pretending to be a president for all of America,” Charles said, likely with a straight face earned only through years of mainlining delusion. 

Another self-proclaimed expert on the Second Amendment, University of Chicago law professor Darrell A.H. Miller, claims the investigation is a reversal for Republicans, who have previously spoken out against other pattern-and-practice investigations into problematic police departments conducted by civil rights attorneys at the DOJ.

“Republicans in particular extolled a lot of belief in local control and states’ rights,” but for the 2nd Amendment, “those priorities get reversed,”

Stop conflating issues, you petulant dolt. Conservatives may not have been fans of idiotic attempts to create classes of people protected from the consequences of their actions, nor are we fans of defunding the police or kowtowing to angry mobs who demand every police action against a member of their community is driven by racism. Additionally, the issue of the Second Amendment is not one of “states’ rights,” no matter how much you want to cry about it. It is a Constitutionally protected right at the federal level, which grants no right to subversion by the state. 

Chuck Michel, the president of the California Rifle and Pistol Association, welcomed the investigation and took a pat on the back, telling The Times he believes it comes as a result of his group’s lawsuit challenging the matter. He also opined against violations in jurisdictions outside of Los Angeles County, as excessive fees and waiting times indicate a pattern of behavior and a strategy rather than an isolated case of understaffing.
“I think the reason the DOJ is getting involved in this jurisdiction is because of the things we uncovered in this lawsuit… The primary issues that we are now facing from somewhat recalcitrant jurisdictions is excessive fees to go through an application process and excessive wait times to try to get a license — and wait times that exceed the state 120-day limit, some going out to 18 months or two years,” Michel said.

Bondi says she hopes the announcement will encourage other localities to “voluntarily embrace their duty to protect Second Amendment rights” but warns that if it isn’t the case, this investigation will be one of many that could spread nationwide. 

Although the Supreme Court has suggested that “onerous” gun-permitting processes may be beyond the scope of Constitutionality, they have successfully kicked that can down the road for future taxpayer-funded litigation, as they do, by not delineating the amount of time or a prohibitive level of expense that should be adhered to. Well, perhaps the ATF should issue a rule. They are the regulatory body under the DOJ, and they seem to have had no qualms issuing them in the past under penalty of imprisonment against American citizens. Pam, if you’re listening…

By Gregory Kielma February 21, 2026
Three Teens Arrested in Armed Robbery of Sarasota Gas Station Post Date:02/21/2026 SARASOTA – Three people have been arrested by Sarasota police and are facing felony charges in connection with an armed robbery that happened Wednesday, Feb. 18. Pursuant to Florida State Statute 985.04 (2)(a)1., information about juveniles charged with felonies is public record. Christopher Woo-Piner, 18, of Sarasota; Roberto Gonzalez-Ramos, 16, of Sarasota; and Samuel Medina-Camacho, 15, of Sarasota, were arrested on Friday, Feb. 20. They are facing felony charges of armed robbery with a firearm. On Feb. 18, at approximately 10:30 p.m., officers responded to the 3500 block of Fruitville Road for a reported armed robbery at a gas station. When officers arrived, the employee working shared that three people entered the store, robbed him at gunpoint and left the store. Surveillance video shows three people entering the store. One person is seen walking around the front counter and pointing a handgun with an extended magazine towards the victim. The suspect is then seen pointing the gun at the victim as he removed cash from the register. At the same time, the two other people are seen taking merchandise from store shelves. All three people ran from the store. A significant amount of cash and merchandise was stolen. “Crime is not tolerated in our city,” said Chief Rex Troche. “Our officers and detectives began investigating immediately upon dispatch. In less than 48 hours, three people were identified and arrested. If you commit a crime in the City of Sarasota, we will find you and you will be arrested,” said Chief Troche. This case remains an active investigation. Anyone with information is asked to call the Sarasota Police Department Criminal Investigations Division at 941-263-6070 or remain anonymous and call Crime Stoppers of Sarasota County at 941-366-TIPS (8477).
By Gregory Kielma February 17, 2026
What a Good Concealed Carry Gun Should Look and Feel Like: My Perspective By Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 2/17/2026 Choosing a concealed carry firearm isn’t about trends, brand loyalty, or what someone on the internet says is “the best.” It’s about selecting a tool that fits your body, your training level, and your defensive needs. After years of teaching responsible gun owners, I’ve learned that the right concealed carry gun shares a few unmistakable qualities—both in how it looks and how it feels in the hand. It Should Look Purpose Built, Not Flashy A good, concealed carry gun isn’t a showpiece. It’s a defensive tool. From my perspective, the ideal CCW firearm has: • Clean, snag free lines that won’t catch on clothing during the draw. • A modest profile—not oversized, not underpowered, just balanced for daily carry. • Durable, no nonsense finishes that hold up to sweat, humidity, and constant holster contact. • Simple, intuitive controls that don’t require fine motor skills under stress. A carry gun should visually communicate reliability. Nothing about it should look fragile, overly complicated, or designed for anything other than personal protection. It Should Feel Like an Extension of Your Hand The “feel” of a concealed carry gun is where most people make or break their choice. A proper CCW firearm should: • Seat naturally in your grip without forcing your wrist into awkward angles. • Offer enough grip texture to stay secure under stress, but not so aggressive that it tears up clothing or skin. • Balance well—not nose heavy, not top heavy, just stable and predictable. • Provide a trigger you can manage consistently, with a clean break and a reset you can feel. If the gun feels like you’re fighting it, it’s the wrong gun. A carry firearm should disappear into your hand and allow you to focus on the fundamentals, not the ergonomics. It Should Shoot Better Than Its Size Suggests Small guns are harder to shoot well. That’s reality. A good, concealed carry gun overcomes that by offering: • Manageable recoil that doesn’t punish the shooter. • Sights you can actually see, not tiny nubs that disappear in low light. • Predictable accuracy—not match grade, but consistent and confidence building. • A controllable frame that allows fast follow up shots without wrestling the gun. If a student can’t keep rounds on target under stress, the gun isn’t helping them—it’s hindering them. It Must Fit the Mission A concealed carry gun should match the owner’s lifestyle and training commitment. That means: • It conceals well in your actual clothing, not just in theory. • It works with a quality holster, not a bargain-bin afterthought. • It’s a gun you’re willing to train with regularly, not one that hurts to shoot or feels intimidating. • It’s reliable with defensive ammunition, not just range ammo. A firearm that doesn’t fit your daily life won’t get carried. And a gun that isn’t carried can’t protect you. Kielma’s Parting Shot: A good concealed carry gun doesn’t need to impress anyone. It needs to be safe, reliable, and suited to the person who carries it. When a firearm looks clean, feels natural, and performs consistently, it becomes a trustworthy defensive tool—not a burden. That’s the standard I teach, and it’s the standard every responsible gun owner deserves to follow. Gregg Kielma
By Gregory Kielma February 17, 2026
Bloody 'trans' rampage at boys' hockey game brought to an end by 'Good Samaritan' Joseph MacKinnon February 17, 2026 This is why Rhode Island firearms laws are bad. Could a well-armed citizen might have been stopped the rampage sooner? The dead shooter, who police indicate went by a female name, appears to have rationalized 'trans' rampages. A week after a trans-identifying man went on a rampage in Western Canada, killing six children and two adults, another man who masqueraded as a woman allegedly took aim at innocents — this time at a local skating rink in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. Families, students, and supporters flocked to the Dennis M. Lynch Arena on Monday afternoon to watch a boys' high school hockey game between the Blackstone Valley School and Coventry-Johnson co-op teams. Pawtucket Mayor Donald Grebien noted that "what should have been a joyful occasion" was "instead marked by violence and fear." A man dressed as a woman and believed to have been in the possession of multiple weapons fatally shot two people and left another three victims in critical condition. At least two of the victims are reportedly children. Sign up for the Blaze newsletter Coventry Public Schools revealed on Monday evening that all of its students present at the incident "have been accounted for and are safe." Providence Country Day School and St. Raphael Academy also indicated their students were safe. Arena footage shows players rushing off the ice and fans taking cover as roughly 13 gunshots ring out. The Providence Journal noted that 11 seconds after the first series of shots, a final shot can be heard. Police responding to a report of an active shooter around 2:30 p.m. were on the scene within a minute and a half; however, the blood-letting had apparently already come to an end. Pawtucket Police Chief Tina Goncalves indicated that "a Good Samaritan stepped in and interjected in this scene, and that's probably what led to a swift end of this tragic event." The "Good Samaritan" who was unarmed, apparently tried to "subdue" the shooter, who police said died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) expressed gratitude for the first responders "who rushed to assist, as well as the good Samaritan who confronted and tried to disarm the shooter." Goncalves identified the shooter as Robert Dorgan, 56, and indicated that "he does go by the name of Roberta, also uses the last name of Esposito." The chief noted further that while his motive is presently unclear, "this was a targeted event" and "looked like it was a family dispute." A distraught woman who did not provide her name told WCVB-TV while exiting the PPD station that her father was the shooter. "He shot my family, and he's dead now," said the unidentified woman, adding that the shooter "has mental health issues." Court records reviewed by WPRI-TV reportedly show that Dorgan complained in 2020 to the North Providence Police Department that in the wake of his sex-rejection surgery, his father-in-law was trying to kick him out of the family house where Dorgan had lived for seven years. While the father-in-law was initially charged with intimidation of witnesses and victims of crimes and obstruction of the judicial system, the charges were later dismissed. The same year, Dorgan accused his mother of assaulting him and acting in a "violent, threatening, or tumultuous manner." Although his mother was charged with simple assault and battery and disorderly conduct, the case was similarly dismissed. Around the time of Dorgan's dispute with his father-in-law and mother, Dorgan's then-wife, Rhonda Dorgan, filed for divorce. While she initially cited "gender reassignment surgery, narcissistic + personality disorder traits" as the grounds for the divorce, WPRI indicates his ex-wife replaced those reasons with "irreconcilable differences, which have caused the immediate breakdown of the marriage." An apparently Rhode Island-based user on X who went by "Roberta Dorgano" posted on May 9, 2019, "Transwoman, 6 kids: wife — not thrilled." In a recent post, the user who the New York Post suggested was Robert Dorgan, noted, "I have a beloved RHONDA." In response to a Feb. 14 assertion by actor Kevin Sorbo that trans-identifying Rep. Sarah McBride (D-Del.) "is a man," the X user wrote, "Keep bashing us. but do not wonder why we Go BERSERK." Dorgan appears to be the latest addition to a growing list of recent trans-identifying mass shooters and would-be mass shooters. • A trans-identifying man murdered six kids and two adults in Tumbler Ridge, British Columbia, on Feb. 10. • A trans-identifying man shot up a Catholic church full of children in Minneapolis on Aug. 27, 2025, killing two children and injuring 30. • A male-identifying woman planned to shoot up an elementary school and a high school in Maryland in April 2024 but was stopped in time by police — then later convicted. • A trans-identifying teen stalked the halls of a school in Perry, Iowa, on Jan. 4, 2024, ultimately murdering a child and an adult and wounding several others. • A trans-identifying woman stormed into a Presbyterian school in Nashville on March 27, 2023, murdering three children and three adults.
By Gregory Kielma February 17, 2026
How Long Do You Shoot? Kielma advises, until the threat is over. No more no less. Be the reasonable person. The consequences can be devastating. Police live by different rules, just ask Polk County Florida Sherrif Grady Judge. This response is from an avid reader of my blog. My Question: What would you do? Please comment below! A few years ago a couple of teens tried to rob a drug store in broad daylight. The pharmacist/store owner .. an elderly man…. pulled out his own gun and shot one of the intruders. The other ran off. In the store with him were 2 women. He took after the runner. Thinking about the 2 women and their safety before he went out the door he put another bullet in the one fallen…. killing him. He was not in anyway trained in such situations… he was running on adrenaline and fear. Making sure that the one on the floor was not a threat anymore to him or the 2 women. That elderly pharmacist was sentenced to life in prison. The weird thing is a few months later a guy went on a killing spree. He shot/killed some family members… Shot another guy and stole his truck. Doing all this while video posting on Facebook. The law finally caught up with him. The pickup was put out of service. The guy stepped out of the truck and was shooting at the police while walking towards them. ( This was all recorded from a police helicopter. ) The police shot and killed him. After he fell to the ground 3 lawmen emptied their pistols into him from about 30 feet. With a camera/body cam rolling… the one in front turned and looked into the camera and said… “ We had to make sure he was dead. “ That was law enforcement that did that… Men who are supposed to be trained in handling a situation like that. … “ Just to make sure. “… ( Just like what the pharmacist did. ) They were deemed heroes. From an Anonymous reader.
By Gregory Kielma February 16, 2026
Why Many Virginia Democrats Oppose Firearms and the Second Amendment By Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 2/16/2026 Virginia has a long, proud history of firearm ownership. It’s a state built on rural traditions, personal responsibility, and a deep respect for individual liberty. Yet in recent years, Virginia Democrats have increasingly pushed for strict gun laws, sweeping bans, and policies that many lawful gun owners see as direct attacks on the Second Amendment. Understanding why this political group takes such a strong stance helps responsible gun owners stay informed, engaged, and prepared to defend their rights through education and civic involvement. 1. A Different Interpretation of the Second Amendment Many Virginia Democrats view the Second Amendment through a narrow, “collective rights” lens. They argue that: • The phrase “well regulated militia” limits firearm ownership to state controlled forces • The Founders did not intend broad private ownership • Modern firearms exceed what the Founders could have imagined This interpretation leads them to believe the government should have wide authority to regulate, restrict, or even ban certain firearms. Responsible gun owners, of course, see the Second Amendment as an individual right — a safeguard against tyranny and a tool for personal protection. 2. Urban Political Influence Virginia’s political power has shifted toward Northern Virginia — dense, urban, and culturally disconnected from the state’s rural traditions. In these areas: • Fewer people grow up around firearms • Gun ownership is uncommon • Gun violence is more visible • Firearms are often associated with crime rather than responsibility This creates a cultural divide. For many urban Democrats, firearms are symbols of danger, not tools of safety. That perception drives their policy positions. 3. A Belief That More Laws Equal More Safety Virginia Democrats often argue that strict gun laws will reduce violence. This belief fuels support for: • “Assault weapon” bans • Magazine capacity limits • Red flag laws • Waiting periods • Expanded background checks • Licensing and registration systems To them, these measures are “common sense.” To responsible gun owners, they are burdensome, ineffective, and aimed at the wrong people. Criminals do not follow laws. Law abiding citizens do. 4. Trust in Government Over Individual Responsibility Many Democrats believe public safety should be handled primarily by government institutions — police, social programs, and community initiatives — rather than by armed citizens. This worldview includes ideas such as: • Ordinary citizens shouldn’t need firearms for protection • More guns in public increase risk • Social programs, not self defense tools, reduce violence For those of us who train responsible gun owners, this mindset ignores a simple truth: When seconds count, help is minutes away. 5. Emotional and Symbolic Politics Firearms have become symbolic in modern politics. For many Democrats, guns are tied to: • Mass shootings • Domestic violence • Suicide • Crime in urban areas Because of this emotional association, firearms become a political target — even when proposed laws don’t address the root causes of violence. This leads to policies driven by emotion rather than data, and rhetoric that paints lawful gun owners as part of the problem instead of part of the solution. 6. A Push Toward Centralized Control Many Virginia Democrats support federal style control over firearms, including: • Statewide registries • Mandatory licensing • Universal permitting • Bans on certain firearms or accessories To gun owners, these measures feel like stepping stones toward confiscation. To Democrats, they represent “standardization.” The tension between these two views fuels much of the current political conflict. Why This Matters for Responsible Gun Owners Understanding the motivations behind Virginia Democrats’ opposition to firearms helps us respond with: • Education • Advocacy • Community engagement • Clear communication • A strong emphasis on safety and responsibility Kielma's Parting Shot My work at Tactical K Training and Firearms — teaching avoidance, de escalation, legal understanding, and safe firearm handling — is exactly what responsible gun culture looks like. When citizens are trained, informed, and safety focused, it becomes much harder for opponents of the Second Amendment to argue that ordinary people shouldn’t have access to firearms. Gregg Kielma
By Gregory Kielma February 16, 2026
3D Printed Guns: What Are They and Are They’re Legal By Gregg Kielma, Owner & Lead Instructor, Tactical K Training and Firearms 02/16/2026 As a Firearms Instructor, Gunsmith and, First Aid Fundamentals Instructor, I’ve watched technology reshape our industry in ways most people never imagined. One of the biggest shifts has been the rise of 3D printed firearms. They generate curiosity, concern, and plenty of misinformation. My goal here is simple: give responsible gun owners a clear, factual understanding of what 3D printed guns are — and what the law actually says about them. What Exactly Is a 3D Printed Gun? A 3D printed gun is a firearm — or firearm component — produced using a consumer or industrial 3D printer. These weapons fall under the broader category of Privately Made Firearms (PMFs), meaning they’re built by individuals rather than licensed manufacturers. PMFs can include pistols, rifles, receivers, and even components like frames or conversion devices. Not all PMFs are illegal, and not all require serial numbers, depending on how they’re made and the laws of your state. Federal Law: What’s Allowed and What Isn’t At the federal level, the rules are more nuanced than most people think: ✔ You can legally make your own firearm for personal use There is no federal law banning the creation or possession of a 3D printed gun, as long as you are legally allowed to own a firearm and the weapon complies with federal requirements. ✔ But the firearm must be detectable Under the Undetectable Firearms Act, all firearms — including 3D printed ones — must contain enough metal to be visible to security screening equipment. ✔ And certain components now fall under ATF regulation A 2022 ATF rule treats many unfinished frames, receivers, and parts kits as firearms, meaning they may require serialization and background checks. State Laws: Where Things Get Complicated This is where responsible gun owners need to pay close attention. States vary widely. States where manufacturing 3D printed guns is explicitly illegal: • Delaware • Hawaii • Rhode Island • Washington States where possessing an unserialized 3D printed firearm is illegal: • Connecticut • New York • Oregon States considering or expanding restrictions Recent legislation in states like Colorado and Washington aims to criminalize not just the guns themselves, but also the digital files used to print them — a major shift that affects hobbyists, makers, and gun owners alike. Digital Files: The New Legal Battleground One of the most controversial areas isn’t the gun — it’s the code. Several states have introduced bills targeting the distribution or possession of 3D printable firearm files. Courts have upheld some of these restrictions, such as New Jersey’s limits on who can access printable gun files. This is a rapidly evolving area of law, and it’s one every responsible gun owner should monitor closely. My Perspective As a Firearms Instructor, Gunsmith and, First Aid Fundamentals Instructor At Tactical K Training and Firearms, I emphasize responsibility, legality, and safety above all else. Technology will continue to evolve, and 3D printing isn’t going away. But neither are the legal obligations that come with firearm ownership. Here’s what I tell my students: • Know your state laws — they may differ drastically from federal rules. • Stay updated — legislation around 3D printed guns is changing fast. • When in doubt, ask — ignorance of the law is never a defense. • Focus on safety and traceability — a firearm you can’t legally possess or transport is a liability, not a tool. Kielma’s Parting Shot 3D printed guns can be legal — but only under the right conditions. Federal law allows personal manufacture, but state laws may prohibit it entirely or restrict possession of unserialized firearms. And the legal fight over digital files is intensifying. As responsible gun owners, our job is to stay informed, stay compliant, and stay safe. Gregg Kielma
By Gregory Kielma February 16, 2026
Glock: Why Does That "Cutout" Exists Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 2/16/2026 The open cutout at the rear of the magazine well on many Glock frames is a deliberate design feature. Its purpose is simple: Let's Take a LOOK That hollow opening is there because (contrary to popular opinion) Gaston Glock really did try to make a pistol that was intended to be held in a human hand. It is a dead-air space meant to add girth and more ergonomic curves to the grip of the pistol to make it more comfortable for a person to hold. A pistol grip serves two purposes: to give the user an interface to hold the pistol, and to serve as the receptacle for the ammunition magazine. But in most designs, the magazine is usually much smaller than the outside dimensions of the grip. And if the grip were designed to accommodate only the magazine alone, it would be a squarish, box-like container that the also box-like magazine would simply slip into. And a bare, boxy magazine is not an especially ergonomic and comfortable thing to hold onto. So Gaston Glock added some extra material to the back of the grip behind the wall of the magazine well to fill up the user's hand a bit and give them something curvier to wrap their palm around. More Reasons: 1. To help strip out a stuck magazine If a magazine becomes jammed — usually from a double‑feed or debris — the shooter can hook a finger into that cutout and manually rip the mag out. This isn’t new; early Gen 1, Gen 2, and some Gen 3 Glocks had it for exactly this reason. 2. To assist with flush‑fit magazines When a magazine sits nearly flush with the grip, there’s less surface to grab. The cutout gives you a purchase point to pull it free if needed. This is the same principle behind modern aftermarket magwells that include side cutouts for stripping mags. 3. It’s not about speed — it’s about reliability under failure Most Glock mags drop free without issue. But Glock designed the frame so that if things go wrong, you still have a mechanical way to clear the gun. As one source put it, the cutout is essentially a built‑in contingency for magazine retention issues.
By Gregory Kielma February 16, 2026
How a Bullet Works: A Straightforward Explanation Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 2/16/2026 As an instructor, I’ve learned that most people who come to me for training have handled ammunition before, but very few truly understand what’s happening inside that little brass case. And honestly, once you break it down, the process is simple, predictable, and rooted in physics — which is exactly why safety and respect for the firearm matter so much. Let me walk you through how a bullet works, step by step, the way I explain it on the range and in my classes. Kielma says, Let’s Take a LOOK: 1. A Cartridge Is a Self Contained System When people say “bullet,” they often mean the whole round. The bullet is just the projectile. The complete cartridge has four parts: • Case – usually brass, holding everything together • Primer – the ignition source • Powder – the fuel • Bullet – the part that leaves the barrel Each component has a job, and none of them work alone. 2. It All Starts With the Firing Pin When you press the trigger, you’re not “firing the gun” — you’re releasing a mechanical chain of events. The firing pin strikes the primer, crushing it. That impact ignites the primer compound, which burns extremely fast and sends a jet of flame into the powder. This is the moment where everything happens in a controlled explosion. 3. Powder Burns, Pressure Builds, and Physics Take Over The powder doesn’t “explode” — it burns rapidly. That burn creates expanding gas, and because the cartridge is sealed inside the chamber, the pressure has only one direction to go: forward. That pressure pushes the bullet out of the case mouth and into the barrel’s rifling. This is where the engineering of the firearm and the ammunition really shows its value. The pressures involved are enormous, but they’re predictable and contained because the firearm is designed to handle them. 4. Rifling Gives the Bullet Stability As the bullet travels down the barrel, the rifling engraves into the jacket and forces it to spin. That spin is what stabilizes the bullet in flight, just like a well thrown football. Without rifling, accuracy would be unpredictable at best. 5. The Bullet Leaves the Barrel — and Physics Begin and Continue Once the bullet exits the muzzle, the pressure drops instantly. From that point on, the bullet is coasting through the air, guided by: • Its spin • Its shape • Gravity • Air resistance Nothing magical — just physics doing what physics does. 6. The Case Stays Behind The brass case doesn’t go downrange. It either ejects (in a semi auto) or stays in the cylinder (in a revolver). Its job is done once it contains the pressure and seals the chamber. Kielma’s Parting Shot: Why This Matters to Me as an Instructor Understanding how a bullet works isn’t just trivia. It builds confidence. It helps students appreciate why we follow safety rules, why ammunition selection matters, and why maintenance and inspection aren’t optional. When you know what’s happening inside the firearm, you handle it with the respect it deserves — and that’s the foundation of responsible gun ownership. Gregg Kielma
By Gregory Kielma February 15, 2026
Another Poorly Trained Firearm Citizen Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 2/15/2026 Stuart, Florida — Stray Bullets Incident A stray bullet incident in Stuart occurred on February 14, 2026, when a man’s backyard target practice went off course, sending bullets into a neighbor’s home and striking a horse WPEC. What happened According to the Martin County Sheriff’s Office, 28 year old Felipe Pascual Andres had recently purchased a firearm and was practicing shooting at his property on SE Salerno Road. During the session, three rounds left his yard and traveled into a neighboring home. • One bullet passed through the door and wall of the home, landing on a kitchen windowsill. • Another bullet struck the back porch of the residence. • A third bullet hit a horse on the property in the neck WPEC. Arrest and charges Pascual Andres was booked into the Martin County Jail for shooting into an occupied dwelling. Deputies say he faces additional charges as well WPEC. Safety concerns The incident has raised safety concerns for residents, especially in close proximity neighborhoods. Authorities are urging gun owners to take precautions when practicing, such as using target ranges, barriers, and safety protocols to prevent stray bullets. If you are in Stuart or nearby, it’s important to be aware of the risks of unsecured firearms and to follow local safety guidelines to prevent similar incidents.
By Gregory Kielma February 13, 2026
Why You Should Have a CCW License — From My Perspective Gregg Kielma-Tactical K Training and Firearms 02/13/2026 Please take a class. Learn the laws to keep you safe and legal. Let’s take a LOOK. Carrying a firearm isn’t about looking for trouble. It’s about acknowledging that trouble sometimes finds good people who never asked for it. A CCW license is one of the most responsible steps a law-abiding citizen can take to protect themselves and their family, and I say that as someone who has spent years teaching safety, judgment, and real-world decision making. • It Forces You to Take Responsibility Seriously Anyone can buy a firearm, but carrying one in public demands a higher level of discipline. A CCW license requires you to understand the law, know when you can and cannot use force, and recognize that avoidance is always the first option. That mindset alone separates responsible gun owners from reckless ones. • It Gives You Legal Protection and Clarity Florida’s laws—like every state’s—have specific requirements for carrying, using, and storing a firearm. A CCW license ensures you’re operating within the law, and it gives you legal standing that unlicensed carriers simply don’t have. When seconds count, you don’t want to be guessing what’s legal and what isn’t. • It Allows You to Carry in More Places A CCW license expands where you can legally carry, giving you more flexibility in your daily life. Whether you’re traveling, working late, or simply running errands, you have the ability to protect yourself without worrying about violating carry restrictions. • It Encourages Proper Training The best firearm owners are the ones who train regularly. A CCW license is often the first step that motivates people to seek real instruction—learning how to draw safely, make good decisions under stress, and understand the legal aftermath of a defensive encounter. Training builds confidence, and confidence reduces mistakes. • It Levels the Playing Field Criminals don’t follow laws. They don’t schedule their attacks. They don’t care who you are. A CCW license gives you the ability to defend yourself when there is no time to wait for help. You carry not because you expect danger, but because you refuse to be helpless if it comes. • It Reinforces a Culture of Responsibility Every licensed carrier who trains, follows the law, and carries with humility helps strengthen the public perception of responsible gun ownership. You become part of the solution—someone who values safety, restraint, and preparedness. Kielma’s Parting Shot: It’s About Protecting Life, Not Taking It The goal of carrying a firearm is simple: go home safe. A CCW license isn’t about being a hero. It’s about giving yourself the tools, training, and legal framework to survive the worst day of your life if it ever comes.