Gregory Kielma • October 21, 2023
Why ‘Gun Absolutism’ is Counterproductive and Toxic for the Concealed Carry Movement
Why ‘Gun Absolutism’ is Counterproductive and Toxic for the Concealed Carry Movement
By
TTAG Contributor
October 18, 2023
By Timothy Tarkelly
bought my first pistol for concealed carry earlier this year. I’ve been around firearms my whole life and have hunting weapons and a .22 LR revolver for plinking, but it was only recently that I decided to take the next step and purchase a pistol that’s actually designed for self-defense.
As a newly-married public school teacher, I don’t have a ton of money to throw around, so I made a price-conscious, but reliable choice. Of course, a lot of gun enthusiasts, Facebook trolls, content creators, and even writers for reputable magazines would have me believe that I’ve wasted my money.
When I set out to research my options, I found an insurmountable mass of conflicting information. Whether it was based on brand, price, caliber, or concealability, there is a wide range of competing narratives around what “works” and what doesn’t.
What I found is that for every possible variable, there is a voice out there saying that if you don’t buy exactly what they tell you, you’re simply doing it wrong. This form of gun absolutism in the concealed carry world is antithetical to its goal: educating and arming the public.
That won’t happen if we allow gun culture to remain in the hands of arrogant commentators who have sold out our goals in the pursuit of controversy and clickbait.
Every gun owner has their own personal preferences and needs, and that’s a good thing. We develop them based on our experiences and our aspirations. One may say that a Remington .30-30 is the best deer rifle because all three times they used it they got a deer. Similarly, they may say a slug gun is the best weapon for deer because someone they know and trust uses one to great success.
There is nothing wrong with those approaches. However, it becomes unproductive when we decide that our experiences (and those we may aspire to) are the only ones that count.
Bagging the right game or tearing up a bullseye with your firearm of choice doesn’t give you authority over the experience of others. It’s actually possible for two things to be true. Two (or more) guns can simultaneously be good choices.
Hunting and shooting forums are rife with baseless claims amounting to “your GLOCK can’t be a good gun because my Springfield is the best.” Even more egregious are claims based on financial privilege.
It’s All About The Money
Authority is often unearned. If someone writes a review, he must know what he’s talking about, or so we often subconsciously decide. However, if you read the subtext of various gun reviews you can see the comparisons they’re drawing and where they come from.
The gun-buying audience is diverse. We come from a variety of economic backgrounds, but reviews across the web (and sometimes in reputable gun-related magazines) would have you believe we are all materially wealthy. When looking at a review for a budget-friendly manufacturer, reviewers occasionally disparage what they find, not because it’s objectively bad, but because it’s different from what they’re used to.
The reviewers aren’t actually saying the guns don’t hold up or perform well in their intended use. They’re saying they don’t compare to their high-dollar competition.
Don’t get me wrong, I would love to own a Beretta 1301 Tactical Shotgun. Off the shelf and with no modifications, its MSRP is $1,7200 (actual retail is about $1500). When someone suggests to their reader to “go ahead and spend the extra grand for a gun that will actually work,” they’re telling us a whole lot about their worldview and how they view their readers.
In my entire life, I’ve never had an “extra grand” I could throw down on anything, especially when there’s an effective alternative for much, much cheaper.
This attitude extends beyond the few writers who clearly have a brand-oriented agenda. Brand loyalty makes sense if the brand has met your needs time and time again. But if it’s based on anything else, you’re just giving a company that doesn’t care about you free advertising, and paying a steep price in the process. Regardless, it shouldn’t be used to fuel weaponize one’s preferences.
People don’t realize how much their views are skewed by what they have. Looking at some of the claims gun enthusiasts make regarding brand, price-point, and “effectiveness,” we see a lot of brand absolutism and fanaticism out there.
“If you don’t care enough about your life to spend over $500, don’t even bother.”
I recently read a Reddit discussion about a Smith & Wesson revolver and its Taurus equivalent. My question essentially boiled down to, “Since they’re basically the same, is the S&W worth the extra money?” The learned response I got was, “If you don’t care enough about your life to spend over $500, don’t even bother.”
Is that really what we believe? If we want everyday citizens to be armed and have the ability to defend themselves, do we really want to gatekeep over price? If someone is working hard, has a family at home, and is looking for a way to keep them protected, do we really need to police how much money they’re spending?
If someone buys a Hi-Point JHP 45 to protect their home, is our response going to be that they literally shouldn’t even bother loading it?
That line of thinking seems contradictory to a lot of other pro-gun other talking points people spout. Not to mention, when analyzing data in regards to surviving attackers, the most common factor is having a gun. Period. We all know the old adage; the best gun for defending yourself is the one you have and know how to use. All the red dots in the world will do nothing for you if you can’t hit what you’re aiming at.
When you press the naysayers, you usually find that they have no experience with the weapons they’re so triggered by. If they’ve used them at all, you similarly discover that they didn’t use them properly, didn’t clean them, bought the wrong ammo, etc.
There is an even more likely scenario: they didn’t know how to use it at all. If someone has only ever shot a high end 9mm with a comfy grip and a compensator, they might be overwhelmed by how much one feels a .45 ACP bullet run through a stock polymer pistol.
Finding Your Preferences…And Your Haters
We could sit around all day and debate about how many rounds one needs to be truly “safe.” In fact, I have spent a whole day debating this before on a camping trip as my friends and I spent a weekend shooting each others’ guns at an outdoor range.
When it comes to pistols, I like small guns. I don’t know why. Maybe, it’s because of my childhood obsession with James Bond and his small but notoriously lethal PPK and its tiny, single stack magazine
My EDC gun is a subcompact pistol: the Taurus G2S. I tried every pistol in its price range and it was the one that fit my hand the best. It was as simple a decision as that. I haven’t had a single feeding issue, and I’m pretty damn accurate with it.
I own a simple IWB holster for it as well. For a hunting trip I’m going on soon, I decided I wanted an OWB holster that would keep the gun covered as I moved through the forest and braved the cold, wet weather. I purchased a Sneaky Pete holster that keeps the gun completely enclosed. I love it, by the way. I honestly might use it for EDC through January and February when I’m fully bundled in my winter coat.
I posted a picture of it on Facebook and got a surprising number of negative reactions. Let me be clear: this was in a Facebook group for Taurus owners, and I still was getting a lot of blowback for my gun (and holster) of choice.
Of all of the negative comments, my favorite is a pair I received from one user. He first said, “What the actual **** is this wannabe holster? I suggest getting a better holster.” That was followed by “And it’s the single stack. Hope you don’t need more than 7 or 8 rounds.” I edited these to improve grammar and remove emojis, but the point remains.
He was hardly an outlier. Go to YouTube and look at “serious” gun content creators talk about minimum round counts for concealed carry. In the same breath, they’ll tell you that the difference between 10 and 12 rounds can be the difference between life and death, but that if you’re not willing to carry more than 8 rounds, you shouldn’t even waste your time carrying a pistol at all.
I realize that my budget-oriented approach may seem strange to a lot of people. When I went to buy a new shotgun, I wanted something that could bag game as well as serve as a home-defense weapon. I am the only person I know who goes squirrel and goose hunting with a Winchester SXP Marine Defender, but I do, and it works.
What’s the point?
Why do we own guns? I thought we were all in this to exercise our rights and defend our lives. It just seems that far too many people are in this for other, less obvious reasons.
Some just want to flex the worth of their toys and feel like they’ve purchased proof that they are, in fact, better than everyone else. We’ve tied too many false notions (many about themselves) to their gun ownership.
It’s not a tool designed to make you feel tough or invincible. It isn’t some form of means to a social end. Perhaps, we should all evaluate what draws us to buying the guns we do and to the online communities and publications that celebrate them.
In the meantime, I’ll proudly carry my single stack pistol in the strangest holster I can find.
DOJ Announces Rulemaking Package Aimed At Protecting Second Amendment Freedoms
Why Every Home Should Have a Firearm for Personal Protection
3d Printed Firearms What are They and Are they Legal? Let's take a look
Being Prepared for the 2026 Hurricane Season By Gregory Kielma, Tactical K Training & Firearms The 2026 Hurricane Season is shaping up to be another year where preparation isn’t optional it’s essential. Florida has seen record heat, rising insurance pressures, rapid population growth, and increasingly unpredictable storm behavior. None of that is meant to create fear. It’s meant to reinforce a simple truth: preparedness gives you control, confidence, and options when the weather turns. Whether you’re protecting a home, a business, or a family, the goal is the same build layers of readiness before the first storm forms. Start With Awareness and a Plan Storms don’t give you time to “figure it out later.” Your plan should be written, practiced, and known by everyone in the household or workplace. Key elements of a solid plan: Where will you go if evacuation becomes necessary Multiple routes out of your area A communication plan if cell networks fail A designated out‑of‑state contact A plan for pets, elderly family members, and anyone with medical needs For businesses, include: Who secures the building Who handles digital backups Who communicates closures and reopening A plan removes panic. It replaces it with action. Strengthen Your Home or Business Before the First Storm Florida structures take a beating every year. Small improvements now prevent major losses later. Exterior protection: Inspect your roof for loose shingles or soft spots Clear gutters and drainage paths Trim trees and remove dead limbs Install or test shutters Reinforce garage doors—one of the most common failure points Interior protection: Surge protection for critical electronics Elevate valuables and important documents Know how to shut off water, power, and gas If you own a business, walk your property as if you were a storm: What can break? What can blow away? What can flood? Fix those points now. Build a Realistic, Usable Supply Kit For Your Home or Business A hurricane kit isn’t about stockpiling, it’s about independence. After a major storm, help may take hours or days to reach your area. For homes and families: Water: 1 gallon per person per day (minimum 3–7 days) Non‑perishable food Medications and medical supplies Flashlights, headlamps, and batteries Battery bank for phones First aid kit Copies of important documents Cash in small bills Tools, gloves, tarps, duct tape For businesses: Backup power for essential systems Printed employee contact lists Hard copies of insurance documents A plan for securing inventory and equipment Preparedness isn’t about fear it’s about not being dependent on luck. Protect Your Digital Life In 2026, digital readiness is just as important as physical readiness. Back up important files to the cloud and an external drive Photograph your home, business, and valuables for insurance Store digital copies of IDs, insurance policies, and receipts Keep chargers, power banks, and a small solar panel if possible When the power goes out, your digital preparation keeps you moving. Understand Post‑Storm Safety Most injuries happen after the storm, not during it. Be cautious with: Downed power lines Flooded roads Carbon monoxide from generators Unstable structures Contaminated water If you evacuated, don’t rush home. Wait for official clearance. Your safety comes first. Mindset: Prepared, Not Paranoid Preparedness is a discipline, not a reaction. It’s the same mindset we teach in every Tactical K class awareness, planning, and responsible action. A hurricane is a natural event. Your response is a choice. When you prepare early, you protect: Your family Your property Your business Your peace of mind And you set an example for your community. Kielma’s Parting Shot The 2026 Hurricane Season will bring challenges, just like every season. But Floridians are resilient, and preparation is part of our way of life. Start now. Strengthen your home, your business, and your plan. Build your layers of safety before the first storm forms. If you need help building a plan, creating a checklist, or preparing your family or business, Tactical K Training is here to support you with practical, real‑world guidance.
Why You Should Never Travel Through High Water
Convicted Felon Sentenced to 87 Months in Trafficking Nine Firearms, Including to Buyer Who Said He Was ‘At War’ Thursday, April 30, 2026 U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Columbia WASHINGTON - Brandon Smith, 34, a previously convicted felon residing in the District of Columbia, was sentenced today in U.S. District Court to 87 months in prison for conspiring to traffic at least nine firearms to a prohibited buyer over the course of six months, announced U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro. “Brandon Smith was already on supervised probation for a violent felony when he chose to traffic firearms, and he continued even after being told the buyer intended to use them for violence,” said U.S. Attorney Pirro. “Over the course of six months, he arranged the sale of at least nine guns—including one with an obliterated serial number—to a prohibited individual. This was not a momentary lapse in judgment, but a sustained and deliberate effort to arm someone who could not legally possess firearms. My office remains committed to holding accountable those who endanger our communities by trafficking illegal guns.” On Jan. 9, 2026, Smith pleaded guilty before Judge Howell to conspiracy to commit trafficking in firearms. In addition to the 87-month prison term, Judge Howell ordered Smith to serve three years of supervised release. Federal prosecutors had requested a 108-month prison term. According to court papers, beginning in November 2023, ATF opened an investigation after a confidential source reported that Smith, then on supervised probation for a violent felony, was actively advertising firearms for sale by texting photographs of guns to prospective buyers, including individuals with prior felony convictions. During the next six months, Smith sold or arranged the sale of nine firearms to a buyer on six separate occasions. During the transactions, Smith sold his own personal carry firearm on multiple occasions when a supplier failed to deliver, then purchased a replacement for himself afterward. In early January 2024, as Smith and the buyer discussed an upcoming transaction, the buyer told Smith he needed the firearms because he was “at war” after his cousin had been killed. Smith proceeded with the sale. The buyer had also told Smith he was serving a criminal justice sentence at the time of the transactions. Smith acknowledged that he, too, was “on papers.” Smith arranged a total of six transactions from Nov. 30, 2023, through May 30, 2024, resulting in the sale of nine firearms. At least one of the firearms had its serial number obliterated. On Oct. 26, 2024, MPD officers conducted a traffic stop on the 1600 block of 16th Street SE and found Smith in the front passenger seat of a parked vehicle. Officers observed open containers of alcohol and discovered a satchel at his feet. Inside the satchel, in plain view, was a loaded Glock Model 19X 9mm handgun with a round in the chamber and 16 additional rounds in the magazine. The bag also contained a bank card and government-issued identification in Smith’s name. Smith has prior convictions for Simple Assault (2011), Attempted Robbery (2013), and Robbery and Possession of a Firearm during a Crime of Violence (2016), for which he was sentenced to five years in prison. He was serving a term of supervised probation from the 2016 conviction at the time of the firearms trafficking conspiracy. This investigation was conducted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Washington Field Office, and the Metropolitan Police Department. The matter was prosecuted by Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Brendan M. Horan. Convicted Felon Sentenced to 87 Months in Trafficking
Husband and Wife, and a Third Individual Charged with Firearms Trafficking
33 U.S. House Members Urge Trump To Restore Gun Rights, Name A Pro-2A AG
Maryland Pistol Ban Faces Backlash From Firearms Industry
