Billionares and Guns...Money Talks
Gregory Kielma • August 6, 2024
Billionaires Laura and John Arnold – through Arnold Ventures, a Houston-based for-profit corporation are Anti Gun and funding Flawed Research
Laura and John Arnold
Billionaire Backing Biased Anti-Gun Research
“In this world, you get what you pay for,” said Kurt Vonnegut in Cat’s Cradle, his fourth novel. And when billionaire philanthropists are involved, Mr. Vonnegut is more than right. Nowadays, billionaires get exactly what they pay for.
An investigation by the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project reveals how a former Enron trader and his wife are quietly paying millions of dollars every year to colleges, universities, think tanks and other groups for biased anti-gun research, which is then cited as gospel by the corporate media and used as propaganda by anyone who wants to infringe upon law-abiding Americans’ Second Amendment rights.
Billionaires Laura and John Arnold – through Arnold Ventures, a Houston-based for-profit corporation the couple founded to “proactively achieve social change” and their nonprofit, the Laura and John Arnold Foundation – are quietly bankrolling research that promotes and supports their radical anti-gun views. Their Foundation has more than $3.5 billion in assets.
Despite their predilection to work in secret, the couple’s actions have not gone unnoticed.
“Arnold Ventures is the gun control backer most Americans have never heard of. They quietly work behind the scenes, unlike Michael Bloomberg. However, their influence on trying to shape gun control policy rivals that of the biggest backers of antigun efforts. They regularly donate money to think tanks and academia to propel biased research into the policy arena. Arnold Venture’s philanthropic outreach sounds well-intentioned, but they’re serving up snake oil when they peddle firearms as a disease,” Mark Oliva, public affairs director for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, said last week.
The Arnolds’ massive financial clout creates an unholy alliance between grantor and grantee. Their paid researchers publish findings that support the couple’s views, or they risk the cash spigot being turned off and the loss of millions of dollars to their organization.
When it comes to their donations, it is clear who determines where the money goes.
“Laura and John established the Laura and John Arnold Foundation in 2010. They believe philanthropy should be transformational and should seek through innovation to solve persistent problems in society. As co-founders, Laura and John actively engage in the organization’s overall direction and daily execution,” the group’s website states.
John Arnold started as a trader for Enron, according to Influence Watch. He quit before the company imploded and was never accused of wrongdoing. In addition to gun control, the couple supports health care reform, criminal justice reform, prison reform and several nonprofit media groups.
The RAND Corporation is a major recipient of the Arnolds’ funding. RAND now maintains a gun-policy page. Much of their research is sponsored by the Arnolds.
According to the Laura and John Arnold Foundation’s 2022 IRS form 990, the couple paid RAND at total of $2.8 million, of which $1.7 million was for anti-gun research, including:
• $1,261,269 “to conduct research on how to reduce gun violence.”
• $99,000 “to support the first national conference on gun violence prevention research.”
• $89,000 “to support a convening relating to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Bruen case.”
• $283,546 “to provide objective information about firearm violence and how state laws reduce or exacerbate this violence.”
That same year, the couple paid more than $1.8 million for anti-gun research from other groups, including:
• $28,040 to the National Opinion Research Center “to support the NORC expert panel on reducing gun violence and improving data infrastructure.”
• $219,122 to the University of California at Berkeley “to evaluate the advance peace gun violence reduction program.”
• $1,065,933 to Princeton University “to develop a research infrastructure that helps cities better understand and respond to waves of gun violence.”
• $475,093 to the University of Maryland “to support the center for study and practice of violence reduction.”
In total, the Foundation donated more than $185 million, according to their 2022 IRS Form 990.
Arnold Ventures public relations director, Angela Landers, declined to be interviewed for this story, arrange an interview with the Arnolds or discuss the gun-control research they funded. Instead, Landers chose to send a written statement, which is unedited and reprinted in its entirety:
“Philanthropy can play a unique role in supporting research regarding the impact of many public policies, including those related to gun violence. In this instance, Arnold Ventures partnered with RAND Corp., a nonpartisan and widely respected research institution, to conduct scientific research that offers the public and policymakers a factual basis for developing fair and effective gun policies in the interest of public safety. Sound research is an important part of building evidence-based solutions,” Landers said in her statement.
RAND’s Response
While there were infrequent gun-related projects over the years, the RAND Corporation as a whole did not research “gun violence” until 2016, when there was a mass-shooting near their California office, according to Andrew R. Morral, PhD, a senior behavioral scientist at RAND and the Greenwald Family Chair in Gun Policy.
“A lot of our staff were rattled by it, as were RAND trustees and friends of RAND,” Morral told the Second Amendment Foundation last week. “They contacted our president and asked what we were going to do about it.”
RAND set aside some internal funds because the work was not yet sponsored and investigated, Morral explained. In 2018, they released their first tranche of research.
“Arnold Ventures picked it up and has funded us since then,” he said.
Today, Arnold Ventures is RAND’s largest sponsor of gun-control research. Together with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the two groups pay RAND more than $1.5 million annually, Morral said. Federal grants from the National Institute of Health and the National Institute of Justice provide additional “gun-violence” research funding.
None of RAND’s estimated 1,900 employees are researching gun-control full time, Morral said. Although he estimated between six to eight staffers are studying gun-control topics “as part of their research portfolios.”
Morral denied that Arnold Ventures or any other donor interfered with their research.
“We are very careful to not allow that to happen,” he said. “We haven’t experienced any pressure and we have not been asked to share our findings with Arnold Ventures or any other sponsor. We aren’t held accountable for producing results in a certain direction. Our donors, generally, are interested in us being neutral and objective, which is part of the reason they came to RAND.”
Still, Morral acknowledged that their sponsors can use their research however they see fit.
“We realize it’s used for advocacy, of course. We’re producing scientific results. We can’t control how they’re used. People will use that in a variety of ways. Our results are used by both advocates for more restrictive gun laws as well as advocates for less restrictive gun laws.”
Morral said RAND takes no position on the right to keep and bear arms. “We don’t have policy positions on that or on gun laws or anything else,” he said. “We don’t advocate. We don’t do any advocacy.”
However, it is RAND’s opinion and Morral’s that “gun-violence” constitutes a public health crisis.
“I certainly think there’s a crisis in terms of the number of people dying and being injured each year,” he said. “The numbers are high enough to call that a crisis.”
RAND, Morral said, stands by the validity of their gun-violence research, “subject to the limitations reported in our reports. All research has limitations, and we try to be upfront about that,” he said.
RAND’s position on two frequent gun-control targets is clear, concise and published on its website.
• Concealed-carry laws increase homicides rates: “Evidence shows that concealed carry laws – when states implement more permissive concealed carry laws, there’s a small increase in homicide rates. Our own research has found evidence of that – some suggestive evidence,” Morral said.
• Stand-your-ground laws increase homicide rates: “The current evidence is that when states implement stand-your-ground laws, firearm homicide rates increase,” he said.
RAND researchers published a report last Wednesday, which was funded by Arnold Ventures and a National Institute of Health grant, titled “State Policies Regulating Firearms and Changes in Firearm Mortality.”
Morral was one of the scientists involved in the project.
The objective was to estimate the effects state firearm policies have on gun-related deaths. The researchers examined six policies: “background checks, minimum age, waiting periods, child access, concealed carry, and stand-your-ground laws.”
The findings were mixed. Child-access prevention laws can reduce gun deaths by 6%, and stand-your-ground laws can increase firearm deaths by 6%, the authors claimed.
“Our finding that most of these individual state-level firearm policies have relatively modest and uncertain effect sizes reflects that each firearm policy is a small component of a complex system shaping firearm violence. However, we found that combinations of the studied policies were reliably associated with substantial shifts in firearm mortality,” the authors noted.
All of the authors – Terry L. Schell, PhD; Rosanna Smart, PhD; Matthew Cefalu, PhD; Beth Ann Griffin, PhD and Morral – work for RAND at either its Santa Monica, California, or Arlington, Virginia, offices.
All of the authors except Morral disclosed conflicts of interest: “Dr Schell reported receiving grants from Arnold Ventures and National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism during the conduct of the study. Dr Smart reported receiving grants from Arnold Ventures and the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Cefalu reported receiving grants from Arnold Ventures during the conduct of the study. Dr Griffin reported receiving grants from Arnold Ventures during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.”
The authors claimed that neither Arnold Ventures not the NIH exercised any control of their work.
“The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication,” the report states.
RAND’s NIH Grant of $790,100 was awarded Sept. 25, 2020, and is ongoing.
“Don’t Get Mad About Guns …”
Three months ago, the Trace – the propaganda arm of former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s anti-gun empire – announced they were creating a Gun Violence Data Hub, which would “help journalists access data on one of America’s most critical – and opaque – public health crises.”
“The Data Hub is a multiyear project to increase the accessibility and use of accurate data on gun violence in journalism. Its team of editors, reporters and researchers will proactively collect and clean datasets for public distribution, write and share tip sheets, and serve as a resource desk to other newsrooms, assisting journalists in their pursuit of data-informed reporting,” the Trace reported.
Arnold Ventures was one of the Data Hub’s top sponsors.
To be clear, Arnold Ventures has radical anti-gun views. The group believes “firearm violence” constitutes a public health crisis. “Gun violence,” it claims, has become the leading cause of death of “young people,” not children, the group states on its website. By referring to young people rather than children, they can include 18- to 20-year-olds in their data set to make the numbers work.
Arnold Ventures wants to bridge the gap in anti-gun research, which they say was created by the 1996 Dickey Amendment, which prohibits the federal government from conducting anti-gun research.
Don’t Get Mad About Guns — Get Funding for Research, the group offers on its website.
“It isn’t enough to get mad about gun violence,” Asheley Van Ness, Arnold Ventures former director of criminal justice, wrote in The Houston Chronicle.“Change starts with adequate funding for research, or else policymakers may end up spending time and money on programs that simply don’t work.”
In 2018, to streamline its funding efforts, Arnold Ventures launched the National Collaborative on Gun Violence Research (NCGVR). Its mission is to “fund and disseminate nonpartisan, scientific research that offers the public and policymakers a factual basis for developing fair and effective gun policies.”
“At Arnold Ventures, we use our resources to confront some of the most pressing problems facing our nation,” Arnold Ventures President and CEO Kelli Rhee stated on the group’s website. “Five years ago, we, like many others, recognized that our understanding of gun violence was suffering from a severe lack of investment in research, and we joined together with our partners to try and fill some of the gap. While more investment from both public and private entities is undoubtedly needed, the National Collaborative on Gun Violence Research has made significant progress in building the gun policy evidence base.”
Since 2022, the NCGVR has issued more than 50 grants, including “13 dissertation research projects and seven post-doctoral research fellowships, as well as awards for large new studies on domestic gun violence, officer-involved shootings, harms to firearm owners associated with gun laws, gun suicides, gun policy analysis and urban gun violence.”
Arnold Ventures chose RAND to administer the NCGVR, and RAND put Morral in charge. Today, Morral co-leads the NCGVR, which he says brings RAND “a couple hundred-thousand dollars per year.”
“It was an opportunity to improve research in the field,” Morral told the Second Amendment Foundation. “It was something that seemed like an interesting project to work to elevate. There wasn’t much research going on, and it was an area we were trying to make some headway in with our own funding. We recognized there was a gap in knowledge about gun policy that wasn’t being studied.”
Takeaways
There is certainly nothing unlawful about a well-heeled couple sponsoring gun-control research or research of any kind. The Arnolds are free to spend their millions as they see fit. However, since their largesse can negatively impact the civil rights of millions of law-abiding Americans, the Arnolds should be prepared to answer for their philanthropy.
The couple has created a pipeline of sorts, cash goes in one end and anti-gun propaganda comes out the other.
The risks they’ve created are dire.
“When a cable TV news actor cites some farcical statistic about guns or gun owners, it’s important to understand how that number made it onto the teleprompter,” said Second Amendment Foundation founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “It starts with donor dollars sent to researchers at left-leaning colleges, universities or other groups, who publish reports that mirror their donors’ views, which are then regurgitated by the corporate media. It’s a factory-like process. We don’t have anything like that. We don’t need it. We simply rely upon the truth.”
The Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project wouldn’t be possible without you. Click here to make a tax-deductible donation to support pro-gun stories like this.
I Love to Cook Here Are The Necessary Steps To Properly Clean Your Shellfish All my friends know I love to cook says Gregg Kielma; FFL, Firearms Instructor, First Aid Fundamentals Instructor, ERT Captain and Gunsmith. From award winning barbeque to my fresh seafood, my passion is cooking. I'm no means a chef. But I'd like to think I could give them a good run for their money. Take a look below at some of the ways to stay safe while making your favorite seafood dishes. Remember safety first! For some of my best seafood recipes please drop me an email and I'll send a few to you! kielmagregory@gmail.com Discover how to clean clams, mussels, and shrimp at home with simple tips for maintaining freshness, proper storage, and optimal flavor.© Catherine Sillars • Preparing seafood at home can save money and deliver restaurant-level results. • Knowing how to check freshness is key to cooking great clams, mussels, and shrimp. • Proper storage is crucial to preserving the flavor and freshness of shellfish. It might seem impossible to enjoy a fancy seafood dinner while on a penny-pinching budget, but that’s only because you’re not prepping it yourself at home. Cooking your own shellfish is far cheaper than ordering it out, and not nearly as intimidating as it sounds. And you don't need to work at a seafood counter to do it right. Cleaning your own shellfish doesn’t have to be a scary or complicated undertaking. Consider this your 101 guide to cleaning three popular kinds of shellfish at home, plus a few recipe recommendations to put your new skills to delicious use. Clams Fresh clams should be alive when you buy them, so treat them like the delicate little divas they are. If their shells are open, give them a tap—if they snap shut, they’re good to go. If they stay open or look cracked, throw them out. If you can’t quite tell or there's a questionable smell, toss 'em straight into the trash. Before cooking, they need to be cleaned inside and out. Rinse the clams under cold running water while scrubbing off any grit with a clean sponge or dish towel. Next, soak them in a big bowl of ice water with a handful of kosher salt for about 20 minutes. This “purging” step helps them release any hidden sand—because no one wants crunchy clams casino. Store the clams on a wire rack inside a deep baking dish or broiler pan. Top with ice and cover with a clean kitchen towel. Keep them cold (but not submerged) so they can breathe. Once you’re ready to cook the clams, get a little inspiration from our recipes for clam chowder or linguine with clams. Mussels Mussels get the same shell-tap test as clams. If they have cracked shells or don’t close when tapped or rinsed under cold water, to the trash they go. Rinse the remaining mussels under cold running water and scrub away any grit. The key here is removing the “beard”—those stringy fibers poking from the shell seam on the thicker end of the mussel. Grip it with your fingers or a clean towel and tug firmly toward the hinge until it releases. Once they’re clean on the outside, submerge the mussels in a salty ice water bath for 20 minutes to purge sand and grit, then drain and rinse again. Store them just like you would clams—wire rack over ice, covered with a damp cloth. For dinner, try out our recipes for the classic moules frites or steamed mussels with tomatoes and garlic. Shrimp Shrimp are the easiest of the bunch—no temperature-sensitive shells or purging required— but they still need to be fresh. They should smell like the ocean and feel plump and firm to the touch. If your shrimp still have heads, twist and remove them. Remove the legs, then peel the shrimp from the curved side. Leave the tails on if you're making shrimp cocktail or anything dippable, so you have a built-in handle. Then, use a paring knife to make a shallow slit down the back and remove the dark vein (aka digestive tract). Finally, rinse the shrimp under cold water, and then get to cooking dishes like shrimp street corn skillet, shrimp and tomato succotash, or creamy lemon garlic shrimp.
The United States is Invaded: What Would You Do? In case of a US invasion by another country, would US citizens truly fight back with their guns as allowed by the 2nd amendment? Never in the history of warfare has there a worse nightmare. We follow a Prussian model; many of our private citizens have good military training and access to arms. Opposition Officers would need to fill out their next of kin while getting off the boat. Most would live less than 48 hours. People would shoot infantry forces to pieces and disappear into home terrain at night. Communications lines cut, fuel blown up, anyone moving after dark might as well shoot themselves and get it over with. A simple troop movement through Appalachia would make them all wish they’d never been born. I couldn’t imagine fighting in mountains against an enemy where everyone has a gun and 10 percent of them have military training. And I mean everyone would have a gun. Even if a small percentage of well-trained citizens reacted the effects would be devastating. To quote a WWII Japanese leader “there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass. Then the scary stuff would start. Fuel air bombing their hospitals and command centers, homemade mines everywhere, kids hanging from trees. We are the big scary country… but no one should forget we invented the ambush, sneaking up in the woods, sniping from behind rocks shooting conventional forces to pieces and really making them wish they could go home. We trained the Viet Cong during WWII to fight the Japanese. We are so good at it that the forces we train can rise up and terrorize our own conventional forces.
What Are The Fundamental Rule of Concealed Carry? Gregg Kielma Tactical K Training and Firearms Instructor My Thoughts The first rule in my opinion is having a CCW permit split into distinct three rules. 1. Concealed means concealed. What you can conceal depends on your body type. Finding the right gun to conceal, in a holster that’s most comfortable, using a carry method (strong-side, appendix, belly band, ankle, etc) that works best for you requires some experimentation. Most people probably won’t notice, sure, but criminals can spot bad concealment with ease. a. Concealed doesn’t just mean in a visual sense. Don’t advertise to the whole world that you are conceal carrying. Keep it on a need-to-know basis (spouse, best friend, informing a police officer when required by law, etc). Removing bumper stickers from your car and clothing from your wardrobe that scream “I have a gun” is a big plus. 2. Carry means carry. Don’t leave it at home. Don’t leave it in the car when your grocery shopping. Concealed carry is pointless if your gun is not immediately available to you when you need it. Make it a point to carry every single day, always, wherever lawful to do so. 3. Weapon should mean your wits. Understand that use of lethal force is ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS a last resort. Your wits should be your greatest weapon; Just because you carry doesn’t mean you’re invincible. Avoiding confrontation is always the best outcome, no matter how damaged your ego becomes. Pay attention to your surroundings and get out of dodge when your gut feeling says something isn’t right. However, if you’re in a dangerous situation, and you feel like you’re in fear of your life… draw swift, aim true, and when in doubt shot accurately until the threat is stopped. Gregg Kielma Tactical K Training and Firearms Instructor 941 737-6956
Real Life Training: You Asked For It, Here It Is! Gregg Kielma Most of us these days are not getting enough training. Especially if you have your concealed carry license. If we are lucky, we get to the indoor range once a week, but a lot of you out there probably train a lot less than that. Shooting at a static range at paper targets is good, but to really get your skills to the next level, we need to be doing much more because we all know that is NOT how real gun fights work. There will be a lot of movement from both you and the bad guy. There will most likely be other people around that you must MAKE SURE to protect and not accidentally shoot them instead of the bad guy. We’ll give you a little taste of shooting around civilians and taking control of your family, friends or dinner date and guiding them out of harm’s way. Yes, we understand that the targets are not moving, and the cardboard civilians are just standing in one place and not running around screaming their heads off, but this is how we start you off getting used to shooting from awkward positions. We are also teaching how to get up and move to make sure you have a good shot at the bad guy and there is no chance you are going to hit an innocent bystander. Once we are happy with the students’ performance here, we switch over to UTM rounds (paintball bullets) and see how you do when the rubber dummies are real people shooting back and the civilians are running around in front of you. If you’re interested in being a part of this training, you can sign up as soon as it is offered or call for dates and times. It’s 3 days broken down this way: 1 day 8 hours classroom and 2 days at the range. You must supply your handgun with 200 rounds of ammo safety glasses, holster or holsters, long pants, and hat. Tactical K provides paintball guns, goggles and vest. Due to class conducted outside the classes are offered here in Florida from November1st through May15th. Class size is limited to 6 students. Classroom training is on Saturday morning and range time is the following Saturday (8 hours) and Sunday (6hours). Lunch and drinks provided at the range. (1 hour lunch break) Prerequisite: All training is certified with certificates provided through “The USCCA “and “Tactical K Training and Firearms” Certificates provided at graduation or course completion. • CCW Certified and Current (100.00) • Holster Certified Training (4 hours 60.00) • Home Defense Certified Training (4 hours $75.00) • Emergency First Aid Fundamentals (8 hours 150.00) • Safety Training (2 hours 50.00) • These must be taken before the 3-day outdoor class. Plan accordingly with the instructors. Cost: $435.00 Three-day outdoor class: $800.00 Total cost: $1235.00 Limited to 6 students: This is up close and very personalized intense training. Must be paid in full before the class. Payments accepted upon approval from Tactical K Training and Firearms. Liability waver must be sign. Please call for the next training days offered through Tactical K Training and Firearms. Gregg Kielma 941 737-6956
Florida Woman Arrested For Attempted Murder After Shooting At Neighbors Over Dog Dispute In an escalation of a neighborhood dispute, Sherry Lynn Garrison, a 54-year-old Florida woman, was arrested Friday in Middleburg after allegedly firing multiple shots at her neighbors and their home in the 5600 Block of Bee Hive Road. Says Gregg Kielma a Florida Firearms Instructor, was it really worth it Sherry? Shooting at your neighbors and neighbors' home with children inside. Shame on you and your neighbor for initiating a conflict by having his own firearm and shooting into the ground to scare you. And then you go inside, retrieve a firearm and start shooting at them, Wow! Then you fight with the police. What's wrong with you? Definite jail time coming if all these allegations are true. Poor choices Sherry. All of this because of a dog? See the article below. The incident, sparked by an argument over dogs, turned violent when Garrison, after pushing a neighbor, retrieved a handgun and shot at two adults in their yard and into their residence, where six children and another adult were present. At approximately 7:00 A.M., deputies from the Clay County Sheriff’s Office responded to a disturbance in the 5600 Block of Beehive Road following a report of gunfire. The suspect, Sherry Lynn Garrison, 54, was arrested after allegedly firing multiple shots at her neighbors during a heated dispute over dogs. According to the investigation, the conflict began when Garrison engaged in a physical altercation, pushing one of her neighbors. After returning to her own yard, the victim fired warning shots into the ground on his property to deter Garrison from coming back. In response, Garrison retrieved a handgun from her home, returned outside, and fired several shots at the victim and another adult in the yard. She also shot into the victims’ residence, where another adult and six children were present. Fortunately, no injuries were reported. Deputies took Garrison into custody at the scene, though she resisted arrest and fought with officers. Following an interview, Garrison was charged with two counts of attempted murder, one count of shooting into an occupied dwelling, one count of resisting law enforcement with violence, and one count of simple battery. Please make a small donation to the Tampa Free Press to help sustain independent journalism. Your contribution enables us to continue delivering high-quality, local, and national news coverage.
Homeowner charged with assault after fighting alleged intruder — and furious observers are blasting Canadian cops Dave Urbanski August 23, 2025 Even Ontario Premier Doug Ford got into the act, declaring that 'something is broken' in the system when one is punished for self-defense. Police in Ontario, Canada, said they charged a homeowner after he fought with an alleged intruder earlier this week. Kawartha Lakes Police Service said officers responded around 3:20 a.m. Monday to an apartment on Kent Street in Lindsay for a report of an altercation between two males. Lindsay is about 2.5 hours northeast of Toronto. 'I know if someone breaks into my house or someone else's, you're going to fight for your life,' Ford added. 'This guy has a weapon. You're going to use any force you possibly can to protect your family. I'm telling you, I know everyone would.' Arriving officers learned that the resident woke up to find an intruder inside his apartment, police said, adding that the intruder received "serious life-threatening injuries" because of the altercation. The intruder was taken to Ross Memorial Hospital and later airlifted to a Toronto hospital, police said, adding that there is no risk to public safety.
Biden judge releases teens accused of savagely attacking Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine August 22, 2025 The judge doesn't want to interfere with the suspects' schooling — even though at least one of them doesn't usually show up. Kielma says, friends protect yourself and family. They could have killed this man. It could have been you or me. A Biden appointed judge lets them free. A disgrace to our judicial system and law-abiding American people. You know what you need to do in a situation like this. Please stay safe and situationally aware. Your life depends on it. Train Train Train! Edward Coristine, the young engineer known as "Big Balls" who previously worked for the Department of Government Efficiency, was beaten to a pulp during an attempted carjacking on Aug. 3 in the national capital. According to the incident report, a group of around 10 juveniles a pproached the 19-year-old and his girlfriend, making clear their intention to steal Coristine's vehicle. Coristine pushed his girlfriend to safety, then squared off with the thugs, who piled on and left him bloodied on the roadside. Police apprehended two suspects at the scene — a 15-year-old male and a 15-year-old female of Hyattsville, Maryland — and charged both with unarmed carjacking. Whereas President Donald Trump figured the incident was bad enough to finally bring an end to the lawlessness in Washington, D.C., federalizing the Metropolitan Police Department and deploying the National Guard, a Biden-nominated judge alternatively decided on Thursday it wasn't worth keeping two of the suspected attackers in custody. 'School and home, that's it.' Sign up for the Blaze newsletter By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, and agree to receive content that may sometimes include advertisements. You may opt out at any time. Kendra Briggs, an associate judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, informed t he female suspect that she would move to a youth shelter house and informed the male suspect that he would get to hang out at his mother's home, reported the Washington Post, which was granted access to the Thursday hearing on the condition that it not reveal the identities of the suspects. Up until this week, the suspects were being held at D.C.'s Youth Services Center, an 88-bed secure facility that keeps detainees under continuous supervision. Although the suspects will enjoy relative freedom, they will still be subjected to electronic monitoring and a 24-hour curfew.
KC Man Sentenced for Illegal Firearms Trafficking Thursday, August 21, 2025 U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Missouri KANSAS CITY, Mo. – A Kansas City, Mo. man was sentenced to five and a half years of imprisonment in federal court today for conspiring to traffic firearms to prohibited persons. Fedo A. Manning, 24, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips, to 66 months in federal prison without parole, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release. On April 17, 2025, Fedo Manning admitted that he knowingly and willfully joined in an agreement to sell firearms to individuals who were prohibited from possessing them under federal law. According to the plea agreement, the conspirators trafficked at least 22 firearms to people who were known felons or they sold firearms that were converted into unregistered machineguns in violation of federal law. Fedo Manning agreed that his role in the conspiracy was to serve as a straw purchaser. He bought federal firearms from federal firearms licensed dealers so that they could later be sold by co-conspirators to individuals who were prohibited from possessing firearms. Between Jan. 13, 2023, and May 11, 2022, investigators discovered that Fedo Manning purchased at least 40 firearms from federal firearms licenses. Of those, 33 were Anderson Manufacturing, Model AM-15 firearms. In the plea agreement, Fedo Manning acknowledged that at least seven of the firearms that he purchased were recovered during investigations of crimes in the Kansas City metropolitan area. One of the recovered firearms purchased by Fedo Manning was discovered at the scene of the shooting that occurred during the celebration of the Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl victory on Feb. 14, 2024. The recovered firearm was an Anderson Manufacturing AM-15, .223-caliber pistol. The loaded pistol was found along the wall with a backpack next to two AR-15-style firearms and backpacks. Because the pistol was in “fire” position and there were 26 live rounds in the magazine, which can hold 30 rounds, it may have fired several rounds before it was discarded. On April 14, 2025, co-defendant Antonio Manning, Sr., 23, a brother of Fedo Manning, admitted that he knowingly and willfully joined in an agreement to sell firearms to individuals who were prohibited from possessing them under federal law. According to the plea agreement, the defendants trafficked at least 22 firearms to people who were known felons, or they sold firearms that were converted into unregistered machineguns in violation of federal law. Pursuant to the plea agreement, Antonio Manning admitted that he was personally involved in illegally selling at least nine firearms and one of those firearms was an unregistered machinegun. On Aug. 7, 2025, Antonio Manning was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips, to 48 months in federal prison without parole, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release. The court also ordered the defendant to pay a criminal forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $11,260. On Jan. 22, 2025, co-defendant Sheron Manning, another brother of Fedo Manning, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to traffic firearms to prohibited persons and to one count of illegally trafficking a firearm that had been converted into an unregistered machinegun. On May 21, 2025, Sheron Manning, 22, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips, to 57 months in federal prison without parole, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release. On Feb. 21, 2024, co-defendant Dejohuan Mietz Huntley, 27, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to traffic firearms to prohibited persons, to one count of possessing an unregistered machinegun, and one count of knowingly being a felon in possession of a firearm. On June 26, 2024, Dejohuan Mietz Huntley, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips, to 70 months in federal prison without parole, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Trey Alford. It was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Operation Take Back America This case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN).
KC Man Indicted for Illegal Firearms Thursday, August 21, 2025 U.S. Attorney's Office, Western District of Missouri KANSAS CITY, Mo. – A Kansas City, Mo., man has been indicted by a federal grand jury for being a felon in possession of firearms and possessing a machine gun. Maurquis D. Jennings, 29, of Kansas City, Mo. was charged in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Kansas City, Mo. on Tuesday, Aug. 12, 2025.The initial appearance was held today. Jennings was charged with one count of being a felon in possession of firearms and one count possessing a machine gun. The indictment alleges that on June 8, 2025, Jennings possessed a Glock, Model 20 Gen5, 10mm fully automatic pistol and a Glock, Model 30 Gen5, .45 caliber semi-automatic pistol. The indictment alleges that the Glock, Model 20 Gen5 contained a machine gun conversion device that made the Glock firearm a fully automatic pistol. Machine gun conversion devices, also known as “switches” or “auto sears,” are used to convert semi-automatic weapons into machine guns that fire multiple shots automatically through a single pull of the trigger, enabling more rapid and often less accurate gunfire. Whether or not they are attached to a firearm, these devices constitute machine guns under federal law. It is therefore illegal to possess, sell, or use machine gun conversion devices. Under federal law, it is illegal for anyone who has been convicted of a felony to be in possession of any firearm or ammunition. Jennings has a prior felony conviction for robbery. The charges contained in this indictment are simply accusations, and not evidence of guilt. Evidence supporting the charges must be presented to a federal trial jury, whose duty is to determine guilt or innocence. This case is being prosecuted by Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Jessica L. Jennings. It was investigated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Lee’s Summit, Missouri Police Department. Operation Take Back America This case is part of Operation Take Back America, a nationwide initiative that marshals the full resources of the Department of Justice to repel the invasion of illegal immigration, achieve the total elimination of cartels and transnational criminal organizations (TCOs), and protect our communities from the perpetrators of violent crime. Operation Take Back America streamlines efforts and resources from the Department’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETFs) and Project Safe Neighborhood (PSN). Updated August 21, 2025
Cincinnati Man Sentenced for Possession of a Machinegun Thursday, August 21, 2025 U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Kentucky COVINGTON, Ky. – A Cincinnati, Ohio, man, Deshawn Parker, 30, was sentenced on Thursday, by Chief U.S. District Judge David Bunning to 24 months in prison, for possession of a machinegun. Says Gregg Kielma FFL, don't do it...STOP the nonsense TODAY! Go to jail for something that's illegal. Stop, stop, stop! It's not worth it! According to court documents, on September 21, 2024, law enforcement conducted a traffic stop of Parker’s vehicle in Covington and detected the odor of marijuana coming from the vehicle. When they asked Parker to exit the car to conduct a drug investigation, Parker refused and attempted to drive off. Officers were able to remove him from the vehicle and found a small amount of marijuana and spent shell casings from a firearm. Additionally, they found a loaded pistol under the driver’s seat. The pistol was equipped with a machinegun conversion device (MCD). These devices are commonly referred to as “switches” or “Glock switches.” Under federal law, Parker must serve 85 percent of his prison sentence. Upon his release from prison, he will be under the supervision of the U.S. Probation Office for three years. Paul McCaffrey, Acting United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky, John Nokes, Special Agent in Charge, ATF, Louisville Field Division; and Chief Brian Valenti, Covington Police Department, jointly announced the conviction. The investigation was conducted by ATF and the Covington Police Department. The U.S. Attorney’s Office was represented in the case by Assistant U.S. Attorney Tony Bracke. This case is part of Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN), a program bringing together all levels of law enforcement and the communities they serve to reduce violent crime and gun violence, and to make our neighborhoods safer for everyone. On May 26, 2021, the Department launched a violent crime reduction strategy strengthening PSN based on these core principles: fostering trust and legitimacy in our communities, supporting community-based organizations that help prevent violence from occurring in the first place, setting focused and strategic enforcement priorities, and measuring the results.
